Virtual Demons: Blue Whale and Moral Panic in the Digital Age

ABSTRACT This article examines the Blue Whale phenomenon as a case of moral panic with particular attention to its trajectory in Turkey. Originating in Russia in 2015, Blue Whale spread rapidly through sensationalist media coverage and soon became framed as a global threat to adolescents. In Turkey, the panic intensified between 2016 and 2019, marked by repetitive headlines, expert warnings, state interventions, and even academic publications, all of which reinforced a protectionist discourse while leaving the veracity of the phenomenon largely unquestioned. Adopting a sociological perspective, this article situates Blue Whale within the broader tradition of moral panic studies, highlighting how archetypes of evil and conspiratorial imagination shaped its circulation. It further argues that the Turkish experience mirrors global patterns yet unfolded through its own media ecologies and cultural anxieties. Ultimately, the Blue Whale panic reveals how digital‐age fears are constructed, sustained, and localized in specific social contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Lens
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Demons: Blue Whale and Moral Panic in the Digital Age

Kerem Karaosmanoğlu
1 citations
Sociology Lens
Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
55.57
article

Virtual Demons: Blue Whale and Moral Panic in the Digital Age

Kerem Karaosmanoğlu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the Blue Whale phenomenon as a case of moral panic with particular attention to its trajectory in Turkey. Originating in Russia in 2015, Blue Whale spread rapidly through sensationalist media coverage and soon became framed as a global threat to adolescents. In Turkey, the panic intensified between 2016 and 2019, marked by repetitive headlines, expert warnings, state interventions, and even academic publications, all of which reinforced a protectionist discourse while leaving the veracity of the phenomenon largely unquestioned. Adopting a sociological perspective, this article situates Blue Whale within the broader tradition of moral panic studies, highlighting how archetypes of evil and conspiratorial imagination shaped its circulation. It further argues that the Turkish experience mirrors global patterns yet unfolded through its own media ecologies and cultural anxieties. Ultimately, the Blue Whale panic reveals how digital‐age fears are constructed, sustained, and localized in specific social contexts.

Sociology LensVol. 39(1)
Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.