Biophysical Skin Response in Head and Neck Cancer: Longitudinal Comparison of Modern Photon and Proton Radiotherapy

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is a frequent toxicity in head and neck radiotherapy (RT), yet the interplay among skin dose, patient phenotype, treatment modality, and objective biophysical skin responses remains poorly defined. Previous studies have been limited by small sample sizes, older RT techniques, absence of dose-response modeling, or reliance on subjective grading. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated temporal changes in skin erythema, melanin index, hydration, and sebum using standardized multiprobe devices at baseline (T1), end of RT (T2), and three months post-RT (T3) in 130 patients with head and neck cancer treated by modern photon RT (volumetric modulated arc therapy, VMAT, n = 90) or proton RT (intensity-modulated proton therapy, IMPT, n = 40). Multivariable analyses examined associations between RT technique, superficial skin dose, baseline phenotypic characteristics, and biophysical outcomes. VMAT and IMPT demonstrated similar temporal biophysical profiles across all time points. Superficial skin dose, rather than modality or ARD grade, independently predicted higher erythema and melanin indices and lower hydration and sebum at T3. Baseline levels, male sex, and higher Fitzpatrick skin type were strong determinants of biophysical skin response at T2 and T3. Hydration and sebum did not recover to baseline at T3, indicating persistent subclinical barrier and adnexal impairment despite clinical resolution of erythema. These findings suggest that biophysical skin response after head and neck RT is more strongly associated with dose and phenotype. Objective assessments reveal latent barrier dysfunction not captured by standard ARD grading, underscoring the value of integrating skin dose metrics and quantitative monitoring into individualized risk stratification and skin-sparing strategies in modern RT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.70146
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biophysical Skin Response in Head and Neck Cancer: Longitudinal Comparison of Modern Photon and Proton Radiotherapy

Yu‐Jie Huang, Fu-Min Fang, Wen‐Ling Tsai
1 citations
The Journal of Dermatology
Effects of Radiation Exposure
31.92
article

Biophysical Skin Response in Head and Neck Cancer: Longitudinal Comparison of Modern Photon and Proton Radiotherapy

Yu‐Jie Huang, Fu-Min Fang, Wen‐Ling Tsai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is a frequent toxicity in head and neck radiotherapy (RT), yet the interplay among skin dose, patient phenotype, treatment modality, and objective biophysical skin responses remains poorly defined. Previous studies have been limited by small sample sizes, older RT techniques, absence of dose-response modeling, or reliance on subjective grading. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated temporal changes in skin erythema, melanin index, hydration, and sebum using standardized multiprobe devices at baseline (T1), end of RT (T2), and three months post-RT (T3) in 130 patients with head and neck cancer treated by modern photon RT (volumetric modulated arc therapy, VMAT, n = 90) or proton RT (intensity-modulated proton therapy, IMPT, n = 40). Multivariable analyses examined associations between RT technique, superficial skin dose, baseline phenotypic characteristics, and biophysical outcomes. VMAT and IMPT demonstrated similar temporal biophysical profiles across all time points. Superficial skin dose, rather than modality or ARD grade, independently predicted higher erythema and melanin indices and lower hydration and sebum at T3. Baseline levels, male sex, and higher Fitzpatrick skin type were strong determinants of biophysical skin response at T2 and T3. Hydration and sebum did not recover to baseline at T3, indicating persistent subclinical barrier and adnexal impairment despite clinical resolution of erythema. These findings suggest that biophysical skin response after head and neck RT is more strongly associated with dose and phenotype. Objective assessments reveal latent barrier dysfunction not captured by standard ARD grading, underscoring the value of integrating skin dose metrics and quantitative monitoring into individualized risk stratification and skin-sparing strategies in modern RT.

The Journal of Dermatology
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Cheng Shiu University (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.