A DGRF 2020 candidate model only based on Swarm ASM experimental vector mode data improved through a dedicated post-calibration strategy

Abstract The ESA Swarm satellites carry a magnetometry payload consisting of an absolute scalar magnetometer (ASM), a fluxgate vector magnetometer (VFM), and a set of star trackers (STR). The primary role of the ASM is to provide 1 Hz absolute field intensity measurements, while the VFM and STR provide the additional data needed to reconstruct the attitude of the vector field and produce the official nominal Swarm L1b magnetic data. Each ASM instrument, however, can be run in an experimental mode to simultaneously produce its own self-calibrated 1 Hz vector data. Such 1 Hz experimental vector data have been routinely produced ever since launch on Swarm Alpha and Bravo, except during one-week periods every month when the burst mode was activated in yet another experimental mode to produce 250 Hz scalar data. These 1 Hz experimental vector data have been used to produce the only Definitive Geomagnetic Reference Field (DGRF) 2020 candidate model only relying on such data. All other candidate models relied on either nominal Swarm L1b data or data from other satellites and ground observatories. In this paper, we report on the way we built our DGRF candidate model and on the post-calibration strategy that we used to identify and remediate a calibration issue found in both the ASM and VFM vector data. We show that this post-calibration improves the quality of the data and contributes to also improving our DGRF candidate model. Our final candidate model, only based on post-calibrated ASM data, turns out to be one of the DGRF 2020 candidate models closest to the final official DGRF model, a posteriori providing evidence of both the quality of the Swarm ASM experimental vector mode data and the value of our post-calibration strategy. This post-calibration strategy could be used to improve magnetic data from other past, present, or future missions. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02343-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A DGRF 2020 candidate model only based on Swarm ASM experimental vector mode data improved through a dedicated post-calibration strategy

Louis Chauvet, Robin Deborde, Pierdavide Coïsson, Thomas Jäger et al.
2 citations
Earth Planets and Space
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
44.47
article

A DGRF 2020 candidate model only based on Swarm ASM experimental vector mode data improved through a dedicated post-calibration strategy

Louis Chauvet, Robin Deborde, Pierdavide Coïsson, Thomas Jäger, Martin Fillion, JM Léger, Gauthier Hulot
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ESA Swarm satellites carry a magnetometry payload consisting of an absolute scalar magnetometer (ASM), a fluxgate vector magnetometer (VFM), and a set of star trackers (STR). The primary role of the ASM is to provide 1 Hz absolute field intensity measurements, while the VFM and STR provide the additional data needed to reconstruct the attitude of the vector field and produce the official nominal Swarm L1b magnetic data. Each ASM instrument, however, can be run in an experimental mode to simultaneously produce its own self-calibrated 1 Hz vector data. Such 1 Hz experimental vector data have been routinely produced ever since launch on Swarm Alpha and Bravo, except during one-week periods every month when the burst mode was activated in yet another experimental mode to produce 250 Hz scalar data. These 1 Hz experimental vector data have been used to produce the only Definitive Geomagnetic Reference Field (DGRF) 2020 candidate model only relying on such data. All other candidate models relied on either nominal Swarm L1b data or data from other satellites and ground observatories. In this paper, we report on the way we built our DGRF candidate model and on the post-calibration strategy that we used to identify and remediate a calibration issue found in both the ASM and VFM vector data. We show that this post-calibration improves the quality of the data and contributes to also improving our DGRF candidate model. Our final candidate model, only based on post-calibrated ASM data, turns out to be one of the DGRF 2020 candidate models closest to the final official DGRF model, a posteriori providing evidence of both the quality of the Swarm ASM experimental vector mode data and the value of our post-calibration strategy. This post-calibration strategy could be used to improve magnetic data from other past, present, or future missions. Graphical abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 78(1)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Laboratoire d'Électronique des Technologies de l'Information (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
44.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.