The Financialisation of the EU Governance of Return and Readmission - Concept note

This concept note examines how the European Union’s evolving financial architecture has turned funding into a central tool for governing return and readmission beyond its borders. Tracing four phases from the 1990s to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, it shows how external migration funding grew from fragmented development aid into a consolidated, conditional system centred on instruments such as AMIF, BMVI, trust funds, and especially NDICI–Global Europe. A multi-level analysis of €35.6 billion in migration and border-management spending, including 221 NDICI–GE projects, finds that the bulk of resources prioritises control, containment, and return over protection, legal pathways, and reintegration, often under humanitarian framing. The note argues that this “financialisation” of externalisation embeds EU return and readmission priorities in third countries’ migration infrastructures, while raising serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the marginalisation of rights-based objectives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232761
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Financialisation of the EU Governance of Return and Readmission - Concept note

Nefise Ela Gokalp Aras, Umutcan Yüksel
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender and Women's Rights
article

The Financialisation of the EU Governance of Return and Readmission - Concept note

Nefise Ela Gokalp Aras, Umutcan Yüksel
article en

Abstract

This concept note examines how the European Union’s evolving financial architecture has turned funding into a central tool for governing return and readmission beyond its borders. Tracing four phases from the 1990s to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, it shows how external migration funding grew from fragmented development aid into a consolidated, conditional system centred on instruments such as AMIF, BMVI, trust funds, and especially NDICI–Global Europe. A multi-level analysis of €35.6 billion in migration and border-management spending, including 221 NDICI–GE projects, finds that the bulk of resources prioritises control, containment, and return over protection, legal pathways, and reintegration, often under humanitarian framing. The note argues that this “financialisation” of externalisation embeds EU return and readmission priorities in third countries’ migration infrastructures, while raising serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the marginalisation of rights-based objectives.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.