Speaking of Opinions: Comparing Approaches to Modelling Opinion Manipulation

Abstract This review outlines the major approaches to modelling opinion formation and manipulation in mathematics and computer science. Key tools such as ordinary and partial differential equations, stochastic models, control theory, and interaction protocols are introduced and compared as methods for describing manipulation. The review is divided into models that use a continuous opinion space and those that use discrete opinions, with the advantages and disadvantages of each discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on bounded-confidence models in continuous opinion dynamics and on binary opinion models in the discrete setting. Finally, the authors provide an interdisciplinary perspective on opinion dynamics and its social significance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
La Matematica
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44007-026-00240-x
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Speaking of Opinions: Comparing Approaches to Modelling Opinion Manipulation

Sasha Glendinning, Andrew Nugent, Luisa Estrada
La Matematica
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Speaking of Opinions: Comparing Approaches to Modelling Opinion Manipulation

Sasha Glendinning, Andrew Nugent, Luisa Estrada
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review outlines the major approaches to modelling opinion formation and manipulation in mathematics and computer science. Key tools such as ordinary and partial differential equations, stochastic models, control theory, and interaction protocols are introduced and compared as methods for describing manipulation. The review is divided into models that use a continuous opinion space and those that use discrete opinions, with the advantages and disadvantages of each discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on bounded-confidence models in continuous opinion dynamics and on binary opinion models in the discrete setting. Finally, the authors provide an interdisciplinary perspective on opinion dynamics and its social significance.

La MatematicaVol. 5(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.