Optimized dicentric chromosome dose–response curves with centromere probes improve low-dose radiation biodosimetry

Accurate biological dose assessment is critical in radiation emergencies, particularly in cases of low-dose exposure. The dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) is the gold standard for biodosimetry, but conventional Giemsa staining often presents challenges in identifying centromeres, especially in morphologically distorted metaphase cells. In this study, we constructed dose-response calibration curves using both Giemsa and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) staining across two dose ranges (0-5 and 0-1 Gy) according to ISO 19238:2023 guidelines. The centromere-FISH-based curves demonstrated improved statistical validity, satisfying Poisson distribution requirements across all dose points and achieving lower minimum detectable doses of 47-94 mGy, compared to 87-127 mGy obtained with Giemsa staining. Furthermore, dose estimation of blinded samples showed higher accuracy and reliability using centromere-FISH-based curves, particularly at low-dose levels (0.05-0.2 Gy). These findings suggest that centromere-FISH staining enhances the sensitivity and accuracy of DCA, supporting its application as an effective method for biodosimetry following low-dose radiation exposure. Furthermore, we propose applying the 0-1 Gy or 0-5 Gy calibration curve to improve the estimation accuracy for low-dose exposure and enable flexible application in radiation exposure incidents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31413-3
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized dicentric chromosome dose–response curves with centromere probes improve low-dose radiation biodosimetry

Wol Soon JO, H. Kim, Chang Geun Lee, Min Ho Jeong et al.
Scientific Reports
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Optimized dicentric chromosome dose–response curves with centromere probes improve low-dose radiation biodosimetry

Wol Soon JO, H. Kim, Chang Geun Lee, Min Ho Jeong, Moon-Taek Park, Yong Uk Kye, Joong Sun Kim, Su Jung Oh, Hyun Seok Choi, Jeong-Hwa Baek, Soo Kyung Jeong
article en

Abstract

Accurate biological dose assessment is critical in radiation emergencies, particularly in cases of low-dose exposure. The dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) is the gold standard for biodosimetry, but conventional Giemsa staining often presents challenges in identifying centromeres, especially in morphologically distorted metaphase cells. In this study, we constructed dose-response calibration curves using both Giemsa and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) staining across two dose ranges (0-5 and 0-1 Gy) according to ISO 19238:2023 guidelines. The centromere-FISH-based curves demonstrated improved statistical validity, satisfying Poisson distribution requirements across all dose points and achieving lower minimum detectable doses of 47-94 mGy, compared to 87-127 mGy obtained with Giemsa staining. Furthermore, dose estimation of blinded samples showed higher accuracy and reliability using centromere-FISH-based curves, particularly at low-dose levels (0.05-0.2 Gy). These findings suggest that centromere-FISH staining enhances the sensitivity and accuracy of DCA, supporting its application as an effective method for biodosimetry following low-dose radiation exposure. Furthermore, we propose applying the 0-1 Gy or 0-5 Gy calibration curve to improve the estimation accuracy for low-dose exposure and enable flexible application in radiation exposure incidents.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Chonnam National University (KR), Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (KR), Dong-A University (KR)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.