An Efficient Computational Seismic Testbed of a Nuclear Power Plant Diesel Generator Building

The state-of-the-art in seismic hazard and risk assessment has evolved to encompass, among others, ground motion selection methods, clustered seismicity, and new fragility assessment approaches. In contrast, nuclear power plant safety assessment follows a more conservative path, adhering to established methods with limited scope for experimentation. Bridging the divide to test and potentially introduce novel concepts requires compatibility with current practice, while avoiding unnecessary modeling complexity. To address this, a low-order computational testbed is proposed within the EURATOM METIS project, to create a fast, open-source assessment platform. It focuses on the diesel generator building of the Zaporizhzhia VVER-1000 nuclear power plant and incorporates simplified models of the building, one non-structural component, and a bare-bones fault tree to propagate uncertainties efficiently for a scenario of loss of core cooling (LoCC). The impact of soil–structure interaction (SSI) is modeled using either equivalent-linear lumped-parameter assemblies with frequency-dependent properties or more advanced frequency- and intensity-dependent configurations. This streamlined setup enables researchers to explore advanced assessment methodologies and provides a practical benchmark for nuclear facilities. As part of the testbed evaluation, the effectiveness of two different ground motion intensity measures is assessed in conjunction with hazard-consistent versus randomly selected earthquake records for the site of interest. In all cases, incorporating SSI and hazard-consistent ground motions offers higher fidelity and more consistent risk estimates with lower conservatism. Coupling these with a more efficient intensity measure, such as average spectral acceleration, offers further improvements, to some extent ameliorating any lack of hazard consistency in record selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02356-x
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Efficient Computational Seismic Testbed of a Nuclear Power Plant Diesel Generator Building

Nevena Šipčić, N. D. Karaferis, Angeliki Gerontati, Nikolaos Lesgidis et al.
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

An Efficient Computational Seismic Testbed of a Nuclear Power Plant Diesel Generator Building

Nevena Šipčić, N. D. Karaferis, Angeliki Gerontati, Nikolaos Lesgidis, Anastasios G. Sextos, Paolo Bazzurro, Stelios Vernardos, Dimitrios Vamvatsikos
article en

Abstract

The state-of-the-art in seismic hazard and risk assessment has evolved to encompass, among others, ground motion selection methods, clustered seismicity, and new fragility assessment approaches. In contrast, nuclear power plant safety assessment follows a more conservative path, adhering to established methods with limited scope for experimentation. Bridging the divide to test and potentially introduce novel concepts requires compatibility with current practice, while avoiding unnecessary modeling complexity. To address this, a low-order computational testbed is proposed within the EURATOM METIS project, to create a fast, open-source assessment platform. It focuses on the diesel generator building of the Zaporizhzhia VVER-1000 nuclear power plant and incorporates simplified models of the building, one non-structural component, and a bare-bones fault tree to propagate uncertainties efficiently for a scenario of loss of core cooling (LoCC). The impact of soil–structure interaction (SSI) is modeled using either equivalent-linear lumped-parameter assemblies with frequency-dependent properties or more advanced frequency- and intensity-dependent configurations. This streamlined setup enables researchers to explore advanced assessment methodologies and provides a practical benchmark for nuclear facilities. As part of the testbed evaluation, the effectiveness of two different ground motion intensity measures is assessed in conjunction with hazard-consistent versus randomly selected earthquake records for the site of interest. In all cases, incorporating SSI and hazard-consistent ground motions offers higher fidelity and more consistent risk estimates with lower conservatism. Coupling these with a more efficient intensity measure, such as average spectral acceleration, offers further improvements, to some extent ameliorating any lack of hazard consistency in record selection.

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
National Technical University of Athens (GR), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.