Social Upgrading in Global Supply Chains: Reframing Corporate Responsibilities

Much philosophical literature on sweatshop ethics assumes that the individual branded marketers that sell consumer goods either employ sweatshop workers or can strongly influence the conditions under which those workers labor. This oversimplification misidentifies the rationale for and details of the responsibilities of big buyers for the labor standards in their supply chains. Throughout this article, we illustrate how philosophers’ “vertical integration” and “control” assumptions distort our understanding of the internal dynamics within supply chains. Under the more realistic assumption that big buyers have “constrained influence” over labor conditions in their supply chains, we show that big buyers retain the responsibility to work toward social upgrading goals. However, fulfilling such a responsibility requires big buyers to collectively cede power to third parties in supply chains in formalized and accountable ways. Recent developments in transnational industrial agreements, such as the International Accord, are examples of this commitment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics Quarterly
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2025.10103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Upgrading in Global Supply Chains: Reframing Corporate Responsibilities

Maria Carnovale, Ewan Kingston
1 citations
Business Ethics Quarterly
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
53.89
article

Social Upgrading in Global Supply Chains: Reframing Corporate Responsibilities

Maria Carnovale, Ewan Kingston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Much philosophical literature on sweatshop ethics assumes that the individual branded marketers that sell consumer goods either employ sweatshop workers or can strongly influence the conditions under which those workers labor. This oversimplification misidentifies the rationale for and details of the responsibilities of big buyers for the labor standards in their supply chains. Throughout this article, we illustrate how philosophers’ “vertical integration” and “control” assumptions distort our understanding of the internal dynamics within supply chains. Under the more realistic assumption that big buyers have “constrained influence” over labor conditions in their supply chains, we show that big buyers retain the responsibility to work toward social upgrading goals. However, fulfilling such a responsibility requires big buyers to collectively cede power to third parties in supply chains in formalized and accountable ways. Recent developments in transnational industrial agreements, such as the International Accord, are examples of this commitment.

Business Ethics Quarterly
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Santa Clara University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
53.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.