Faculty Reflections on Building and Refining a Biomedical Engineering Clinical Immersion Course

Abstract Challenge Clinical immersion experiences are recognized for their educational value to biomedical engineering students, yet the faculty perspective on designing and managing these experiences is often overlooked in literature. We aim to analyze the faculty’s perspective to generate specific recommendations for clinical immersion faculty and administrators. Novel initiative To address this gap, we conducted two 60-min semi-structured interviews with the instructors of a clinical immersion course as part of our community-engaged program evaluation effort. Through thematic analysis, we identified four specific recommendations for clinical immersion administrators and instructors in BME. A senior faculty member should take the lead in initiating a new clinical immersion experience. The clinical immersion curriculum should integrate lecture-based introductions to clinical knowledge, clinical observation, immediate reflection, and formative feedback. Recruitment should focus on getting students with positive attitudes and high motivation. Peer mentors recruited from previous cohorts, instead of teaching assistants, can be a more beneficial and economical investment as part of the instructional support. Reflection These faculty-oriented recommendations have been central to the anecdotal success of our program and significantly add to the current literature on clinical immersion in BME.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Engineering Education
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-025-00212-7
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty Reflections on Building and Refining a Biomedical Engineering Clinical Immersion Course

Xianglong Wang, Jinhwan Kim, Aijun Wang
Biomedical Engineering Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Faculty Reflections on Building and Refining a Biomedical Engineering Clinical Immersion Course

Xianglong Wang, Jinhwan Kim, Aijun Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Challenge Clinical immersion experiences are recognized for their educational value to biomedical engineering students, yet the faculty perspective on designing and managing these experiences is often overlooked in literature. We aim to analyze the faculty’s perspective to generate specific recommendations for clinical immersion faculty and administrators. Novel initiative To address this gap, we conducted two 60-min semi-structured interviews with the instructors of a clinical immersion course as part of our community-engaged program evaluation effort. Through thematic analysis, we identified four specific recommendations for clinical immersion administrators and instructors in BME. A senior faculty member should take the lead in initiating a new clinical immersion experience. The clinical immersion curriculum should integrate lecture-based introductions to clinical knowledge, clinical observation, immediate reflection, and formative feedback. Recruitment should focus on getting students with positive attitudes and high motivation. Peer mentors recruited from previous cohorts, instead of teaching assistants, can be a more beneficial and economical investment as part of the instructional support. Reflection These faculty-oriented recommendations have been central to the anecdotal success of our program and significantly add to the current literature on clinical immersion in BME.

Biomedical Engineering Education
University of California, Davis (US)
University of California, Davis, Division of Undergraduate Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.