AI assisted triage of UK patients in mental health care services: a qualitative focus group study of patients’ attitudes

Patient engagement is a key challenge for digital tools in mental health, but previous studies in digital decision support tools have focussed on clinician feedback. In this study we ascertained the views of lived experience participants in mental healthcare triage and referral in difficult to treat depression. Participants identified delays, errors and confusion in the referral process and expressed positive views on the ability of the CHRONOSIG tool to help to improve waiting times and time spent between services, particularly when used as an addition to a high-quality clinical consultation. In many countries there are shortfalls in mental health care provision with increasing waits in both recorded and unrecorded waiting lists. This study supports a potential route to improve these processes; by more accurately and efficiently identifying the needs of patients and matching these to suitable services and research opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07329-7
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI assisted triage of UK patients in mental health care services: a qualitative focus group study of patients’ attitudes

Jane Grieve, Julia Hamer-Hunt, Nathan Davies, Saiqa Ahmed et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

AI assisted triage of UK patients in mental health care services: a qualitative focus group study of patients’ attitudes

Jane Grieve, Julia Hamer-Hunt, Nathan Davies, Saiqa Ahmed, Katharine Smith, Sean M. Barnes, C Joanna, Cipriani Andrea, Lindsey Hammil-Evans, Katie Brunwin, Terry Bryant, Oana Colta, Colin W. Larkworthy, Alison Ali Bryant, K. M. Keates, Dan W. Joyce, Jim McMahon, the CHRONOSIG group*, Omar Laftah, Maxine McCarthy, Helen Page, Julie Blaney
article en

Abstract

Patient engagement is a key challenge for digital tools in mental health, but previous studies in digital decision support tools have focussed on clinician feedback. In this study we ascertained the views of lived experience participants in mental healthcare triage and referral in difficult to treat depression. Participants identified delays, errors and confusion in the referral process and expressed positive views on the ability of the CHRONOSIG tool to help to improve waiting times and time spent between services, particularly when used as an addition to a high-quality clinical consultation. In many countries there are shortfalls in mental health care provision with increasing waits in both recorded and unrecorded waiting lists. This study supports a potential route to improve these processes; by more accurately and efficiently identifying the needs of patients and matching these to suitable services and research opportunities.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 26(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB), Innovation Team (China) (HK)
Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.