Differentiated allocation of carbon intensity target reduction rates across 332 Chinese cities

This study develops an equitable carbon intensity allocation scheme to support China's "14th Five-Year Plan" target of an 18% reduction in carbon intensity. Based on carbon intensity data from the China City CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Dataset (2020) and relevant socioeconomic data, we construct an evaluation framework with eight indicators across five dimensions: economy, population, energy, technology innovation, and policy. The entropy method is employed to determine indicator weights, and an Improved Equal-Proportion Distribution (IEPD) method is applied to decompose the national target across 332 prefecture-level cities. K-means clustering and spatial autocorrelation analysis are employed to examine regional disparities. Key findings include: (1) The average Carbon Intensity Target Reduction Rates (CITRR) across the 332 cities is 13.89%, with Shenzhen having the highest CITRR (76.80%) and the Daxing'anling region the lowest (4.00%)); (2) CITRR shows a stair-step decline from east to west, with significant positive spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran's I = 0.26, p = 0); (3) K-means clustering categorized cities into four groups with CITRR ranges of 11.24%-72.96%, 4.00%-18.10%, 7.90%-19.64%, and 12.29%-76.80%, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed statistically significant inter-cluster differences, χ² = 146.41, p < 0.001. Based on the results, we propose targeted policies: high-governance cities should promote green industrial upgrades, balanced cities should build specialized industrial chains, manufacturing-intensive cities should advance industry-urban integration, and technology-leading cities should explore innovation-carbon credit synergy mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35781-2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated allocation of carbon intensity target reduction rates across 332 Chinese cities

Meng Yang, Yin Ren, Shudi Zuo, Jiaheng Ju et al.
Scientific Reports
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Differentiated allocation of carbon intensity target reduction rates across 332 Chinese cities

Meng Yang, Yin Ren, Shudi Zuo, Jiaheng Ju, Fengmei Yang
article en

Abstract

This study develops an equitable carbon intensity allocation scheme to support China's "14th Five-Year Plan" target of an 18% reduction in carbon intensity. Based on carbon intensity data from the China City CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Dataset (2020) and relevant socioeconomic data, we construct an evaluation framework with eight indicators across five dimensions: economy, population, energy, technology innovation, and policy. The entropy method is employed to determine indicator weights, and an Improved Equal-Proportion Distribution (IEPD) method is applied to decompose the national target across 332 prefecture-level cities. K-means clustering and spatial autocorrelation analysis are employed to examine regional disparities. Key findings include: (1) The average Carbon Intensity Target Reduction Rates (CITRR) across the 332 cities is 13.89%, with Shenzhen having the highest CITRR (76.80%) and the Daxing'anling region the lowest (4.00%)); (2) CITRR shows a stair-step decline from east to west, with significant positive spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran's I = 0.26, p = 0); (3) K-means clustering categorized cities into four groups with CITRR ranges of 11.24%-72.96%, 4.00%-18.10%, 7.90%-19.64%, and 12.29%-76.80%, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed statistically significant inter-cluster differences, χ² = 146.41, p < 0.001. Based on the results, we propose targeted policies: high-governance cities should promote green industrial upgrades, balanced cities should build specialized industrial chains, manufacturing-intensive cities should advance industry-urban integration, and technology-leading cities should explore innovation-carbon credit synergy mechanisms.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Fujian Academy of Building Research (China) (CN), Academy of Arts (DE), Institute of Urban Environment (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.