Global Strategic Intelligence 50: Board-Level Risks, Blind Spots & Decision Failures for 2026

This report starts from a simple but underappreciated premise:Most boards still frame risk as an external variable: elections, conflicts, policy shifts, market shocks. In that model, organizations assume they will have time to react once events materialize. The Global Strategic Intelligence 50 does not attempt to predict events.It identifies blind spots and decision failures that repeatedly undermine organizations after events occur — even when those events were broadly anticipated. These failures share common traits:Risk ownership is diluted or delegated without accountability.Legal, regulatory, and operational timelines are misread as flexible.Contracts are assumed to absorb friction that has already become structural.Stability is confused with controllability.Decisions are postponed under the illusion that time remains neutral. The question for leadership is no longer:“What might happen in 2026?”It is:“Where would our decisions fail if pressure arrives tomorrow — and how quickly could we correct course?”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232537
Primary Topic
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Strategic Intelligence 50: Board-Level Risks, Blind Spots & Decision Failures for 2026

Jose Parejo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
article

Global Strategic Intelligence 50: Board-Level Risks, Blind Spots & Decision Failures for 2026

Jose Parejo
article en

Abstract

This report starts from a simple but underappreciated premise:Most boards still frame risk as an external variable: elections, conflicts, policy shifts, market shocks. In that model, organizations assume they will have time to react once events materialize. The Global Strategic Intelligence 50 does not attempt to predict events.It identifies blind spots and decision failures that repeatedly undermine organizations after events occur — even when those events were broadly anticipated. These failures share common traits:Risk ownership is diluted or delegated without accountability.Legal, regulatory, and operational timelines are misread as flexible.Contracts are assumed to absorb friction that has already become structural.Stability is confused with controllability.Decisions are postponed under the illusion that time remains neutral. The question for leadership is no longer:“What might happen in 2026?”It is:“Where would our decisions fail if pressure arrives tomorrow — and how quickly could we correct course?”

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
St. Josef Krankenhaus (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Strategic Intelligence 50: Board-Level Risks, Blind Spots & Decision Failures for 2026 — Jose Parejo · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS