The obligation to restrict AI in student writing

Abstract The response to student use of generative AI in higher education has been characterized by ambiguity, and no set of policies has yet become the accepted norm. Individual instructors are, so far, able to take wildly divergent approaches. In this article, I address the use of AI to specifically produce text for written assignments, arguing that universities have an obligation to regulate such uses. I argue that, even if using AI for writing is not technically plagiarism, it undermines education in the same way that plagiarism does. For this reason, educators have a moral obligation to treat AI-generated text, in the context of student education, the same way they would treat text written by a person. Given the impact AI text generation is already having on student practice, I argue that universities have a duty to act quickly and decisively to implement preventative measures and common norms restricting the use of AI in written assignments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf097
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The obligation to restrict AI in student writing

Mark Robert Taylor
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The obligation to restrict AI in student writing

Mark Robert Taylor
article en

Abstract

Abstract The response to student use of generative AI in higher education has been characterized by ambiguity, and no set of policies has yet become the accepted norm. Individual instructors are, so far, able to take wildly divergent approaches. In this article, I address the use of AI to specifically produce text for written assignments, arguing that universities have an obligation to regulate such uses. I argue that, even if using AI for writing is not technically plagiarism, it undermines education in the same way that plagiarism does. For this reason, educators have a moral obligation to treat AI-generated text, in the context of student education, the same way they would treat text written by a person. Given the impact AI text generation is already having on student practice, I argue that universities have a duty to act quickly and decisively to implement preventative measures and common norms restricting the use of AI in written assignments.

Journal of Philosophy of Education
Calvin University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.