Corporate Reputation and Internal Control Quality: Evidence from Fortune 1000 Companies

This paper examines the association between company reputation and internal control quality. The prior literature suggests that reputation concerns reduce the range of risky choices by management. Building on this idea, we propose that reputation concerns drive high-reputation firms to uphold strong internal control quality, leading to lower internal control risk as reflected by fewer material weaknesses in their internal controls. By analyzing Fortune 1000 companies, our study finds that high-reputation companies are motivated to safeguard their reputation, driven by their need to signal strong performance and by the monitoring pressure from high-quality auditors. As a result, these high-reputation companies are less likely to have internal control material weaknesses, reflecting lower internal control risk and higher internal control quality. Our study enhances the understanding of the role company reputation plays in corporate behavior and decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010065
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Reputation and Internal Control Quality: Evidence from Fortune 1000 Companies

Haomiao He, Lijuan Zhao, Fei Kang
Journal of risk and financial management
Corporate Identity and Reputation
article

Corporate Reputation and Internal Control Quality: Evidence from Fortune 1000 Companies

Haomiao He, Lijuan Zhao, Fei Kang
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the association between company reputation and internal control quality. The prior literature suggests that reputation concerns reduce the range of risky choices by management. Building on this idea, we propose that reputation concerns drive high-reputation firms to uphold strong internal control quality, leading to lower internal control risk as reflected by fewer material weaknesses in their internal controls. By analyzing Fortune 1000 companies, our study finds that high-reputation companies are motivated to safeguard their reputation, driven by their need to signal strong performance and by the monitoring pressure from high-quality auditors. As a result, these high-reputation companies are less likely to have internal control material weaknesses, reflecting lower internal control risk and higher internal control quality. Our study enhances the understanding of the role company reputation plays in corporate behavior and decision-making processes.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(1)
California State University Los Angeles (US), California State Polytechnic University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.