Cascaded Optimized Fractional Controller for Green Hydrogen-Based Microgrids with Mitigating False Data Injection Attacks

Green hydrogen production and the use of fuel cells (FCs) in microgrid (MG) systems have become viable and feasible solutions due to their continuous cost reduction and advancements in technology. Furthermore, green hydrogen electrolyzers and FC can mitigate fluctuations in renewable energy generation and various demand-related disturbances. Proper incorporation of electrolyzers and FCs can enhance load frequency control (LFC) in MG systems. However, they are subjected to multiple false data injection attacks (FDIAs), which can deteriorate MG stability and availability. Moreover, most existing LFC control schemes—such as conventional PID-based methods, single-degree-of-freedom fractional-order controllers, and various optimization-based structures—lack robustness against coordinated and multi-point FDIAs, leading to significant degradation in frequency regulation performance. This paper presents a new, modified, multi-degree-of-freedom, cascaded fractional-order controller for green hydrogen-based MG systems with high fluctuating renewable and demand sources. The proposed LFC is a cascaded control structure that combines a 1+TID controller with a filtered fractional-order PID controller (FOPIDF), namely the cascaded 1+TID/FOPIDF LFC control. Furthermore, another tilt-integrator derivative electric vehicle (EV) battery frequency regulation controller is proposed to benefit from EVs installed in MG systems. The proposed cascaded 1+TID/FOPIDF LFC control and EV TID LFC methods are designed using the powerful capability of the exponential distribution optimizer (EDO), which determines the optimal set of design parameters, leading to guaranteed optimal performance. The effectiveness of the newly proposed cascaded 1+TID/FOPIDF LFC control and design approach employing multi-generational-based two-area MG systems is studied by taking into account a variety of projected scenarios of FDIAs and renewable/load fluctuation scenarios. In addition, performance comparisons with some featured controllers are provided in the paper. For example, in the case of fluctuation in RESs, the measured indices are as follows: ISE (1.079, 0.5306, 0.3515, 0.0104); IAE (15.011, 10.691, 9.527, 1.363); ITSE (100.613, 64.412, 53.649, 1.323); and ITAE (2120, 1765, 1683, 241.32) for TID, FOPID, FOTID, and proposed, respectively, which confirm superior frequency deviation mitigation using the proposed optimized cascaded 1+TID/FOPIDF and EV TID LFC control method.