Amplified genome editing by <i>in vivo</i> editor production

Genome editing enzymes have vast therapeutic potential. However, achieving sufficient delivery <i>in vivo</i> remains a major challenge, because editing machinery is confined to the subset of transfectable cells in a tissue. Here, we tested the possibility that genome editing could be amplified <i>in vivo</i> by programming transfected cells to produce and transfer editing enzymes in lipid vesicles to neighboring cells. Our data show that this NANoparticle-Induced Transfer of Enzyme (NANITE) strategy tripled editing efficiency in cultured cells relative to non-spreading controls. Furthermore, a single intravenous injection of the NANITE plasmid into mice induced ~3-fold higher levels of liver editing at the <i>Ttr</i> locus relative to non-spreading controls, with corresponding reductions in serum transthyretin levels. Amplifying therapeutic enzymes <i>in situ</i> offers a nonviral and non-infectious strategy to overcome low delivery efficiencies and reduce effective dose requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.13.699115
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amplified genome editing by in vivo editor production

Wayne Ngo, Kevin Wasko, Z. Li, Jamie L. Y. Wu et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Amplified genome editing by in vivo editor production

Wayne Ngo, Kevin Wasko, Z. Li, Jamie L. Y. Wu, Jingkun Zeng, Daniel Rosas-Rivera, Min Hyung Kang, Mason T. Hooks, Jennifer A Doudna, Shaan Gogna, Longhui Qiu
article en

Abstract

Genome editing enzymes have vast therapeutic potential. However, achieving sufficient delivery <i>in vivo</i> remains a major challenge, because editing machinery is confined to the subset of transfectable cells in a tissue. Here, we tested the possibility that genome editing could be amplified <i>in vivo</i> by programming transfected cells to produce and transfer editing enzymes in lipid vesicles to neighboring cells. Our data show that this NANoparticle-Induced Transfer of Enzyme (NANITE) strategy tripled editing efficiency in cultured cells relative to non-spreading controls. Furthermore, a single intravenous injection of the NANITE plasmid into mice induced ~3-fold higher levels of liver editing at the <i>Ttr</i> locus relative to non-spreading controls, with corresponding reductions in serum transthyretin levels. Amplifying therapeutic enzymes <i>in situ</i> offers a nonviral and non-infectious strategy to overcome low delivery efficiencies and reduce effective dose requirements.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
QB3 (US), Gladstone Institutes (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Innovative Genomics Institute (US), University of San Francisco (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Amplified genome editing by <i>in vivo</i> editor production — Wayne Ngo, Kevin Wasko, et al. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS