Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field

One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water cut. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge of optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem has been observed in the Niger Delta oil fields, where several matured fields are producing at high water cut after many years of waterflooding. This study aimed to improve oil recovery using Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection in comparison with Waterflooding and Gas injection methods in the Niger Delta. Water- alternating-gas (WAG) injection process is one of innovative and new enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This method Improves gas injection microscopic and water injection macroscopic displacement processes. In this study, a computer software known as “ECLIPSE” was used to model and simulate the hydrocarbon flow of an oil field in the Niger Delta. The software was used in optimizing oil recovery using WAG method in comparison with water flooding and gas injection was discussed. From the results obtained, WAG injection had a maximum field oil efficiency (FOE) of 34%, a field oil production total (FOPT) of 76.46 MMSTB, a plateau time of 3.7years and a field water cut (FWCT)of 26.11%. Waterflooding had a FOE of 26.65%, a FOPT of 59.62 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2.2years and FWCT of 47.58%. Whereas gas injection had an FOE of 21.35%, a FOPT of 47.89 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2 years, and FWCT of 9.2%. From comparative analysis of the three recovery methods, WAG injection outperformed both waterflooding and gas injection with the highest FOE of 34%, the longest plateau time of 3.7years, and a minimal water cut of 26.11%. Therefore, WAG recovery method has thus far demonstrated to be the most effective recovery method, in comparison to waterflooding and gas injection methods

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i7-1713592
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field

Chinedu Ikenna Ndubuka, Christopher Etim Okon, Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Mfonobong Edet Umana et al.
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field

Chinedu Ikenna Ndubuka, Christopher Etim Okon, Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong
article en

Abstract

One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water cut. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge of optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem has been observed in the Niger Delta oil fields, where several matured fields are producing at high water cut after many years of waterflooding. This study aimed to improve oil recovery using Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection in comparison with Waterflooding and Gas injection methods in the Niger Delta. Water- alternating-gas (WAG) injection process is one of innovative and new enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This method Improves gas injection microscopic and water injection macroscopic displacement processes. In this study, a computer software known as “ECLIPSE” was used to model and simulate the hydrocarbon flow of an oil field in the Niger Delta. The software was used in optimizing oil recovery using WAG method in comparison with water flooding and gas injection was discussed. From the results obtained, WAG injection had a maximum field oil efficiency (FOE) of 34%, a field oil production total (FOPT) of 76.46 MMSTB, a plateau time of 3.7years and a field water cut (FWCT)of 26.11%. Waterflooding had a FOE of 26.65%, a FOPT of 59.62 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2.2years and FWCT of 47.58%. Whereas gas injection had an FOE of 21.35%, a FOPT of 47.89 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2 years, and FWCT of 9.2%. From comparative analysis of the three recovery methods, WAG injection outperformed both waterflooding and gas injection with the highest FOE of 34%, the longest plateau time of 3.7years, and a minimal water cut of 26.11%. Therefore, WAG recovery method has thus far demonstrated to be the most effective recovery method, in comparison to waterflooding and gas injection methods

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(7)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field — Chinedu Ikenna Ndubuka, Christopher Etim Okon, et al. · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS