Freezing Economies, Melting Futures: The Impact of Sanctions on Climate Adaptation Readiness—Panel Evidence From 68 Targeted Developing Countries

ABSTRACT This study is the first to empirically link international sanctions to climate change adaptation readiness in developing countries from a cross‐national time‐series perspective, providing systematic evidence of the geopolitical determinants of climate resilience. Using panel data for 68 developing countries (1995–2020) from the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND‐GAIN) and a two‐way fixed‐effects (2WFE) model, the analysis finds that sanctions significantly undermine adaptation readiness. UN sanctions reduce readiness by about 2.2%, followed by EU (1.3%) and US (0.9%) measures. Economic and high‐intensity sanctions impose the strongest institutional and fiscal constraints, eroding governance and financial systems essential for adaptation planning. These results reveal that sanctions—though intended for political or security objectives—carry unintended environmental costs by weakening adaptive capacity in vulnerable economies. The study integrates institutionalist and climate‐justice perspectives, calling for climate‐sensitive exemptions in sanction regimes and stronger regional cooperation to safeguard adaptation under geopolitical constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70674
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freezing Economies, Melting Futures: The Impact of Sanctions on Climate Adaptation Readiness—Panel Evidence From 68 Targeted Developing Countries

Chun Kai Leung, Jeremy Ko, Mohammad Ridwan
Sustainable Development
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Freezing Economies, Melting Futures: The Impact of Sanctions on Climate Adaptation Readiness—Panel Evidence From 68 Targeted Developing Countries

Chun Kai Leung, Jeremy Ko, Mohammad Ridwan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study is the first to empirically link international sanctions to climate change adaptation readiness in developing countries from a cross‐national time‐series perspective, providing systematic evidence of the geopolitical determinants of climate resilience. Using panel data for 68 developing countries (1995–2020) from the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND‐GAIN) and a two‐way fixed‐effects (2WFE) model, the analysis finds that sanctions significantly undermine adaptation readiness. UN sanctions reduce readiness by about 2.2%, followed by EU (1.3%) and US (0.9%) measures. Economic and high‐intensity sanctions impose the strongest institutional and fiscal constraints, eroding governance and financial systems essential for adaptation planning. These results reveal that sanctions—though intended for political or security objectives—carry unintended environmental costs by weakening adaptive capacity in vulnerable economies. The study integrates institutionalist and climate‐justice perspectives, calling for climate‐sensitive exemptions in sanction regimes and stronger regional cooperation to safeguard adaptation under geopolitical constraints.

Sustainable Development
Noakhali Science and Technology University (BD), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.