Bearing capacity and mechanical properties of tunnel anchorage layer under full-face and large-face excavation

With the development of large-scale mechanized construction techniques, tunnel excavation is predominantly executed using either full-face or large-face methods, often supplemented with anchor-bolt reinforcement. However, the reinforcement mechanism of prestressed anchor bolts and the impact of excavation methods on the anchorage layer are yet to be comprehensively clarified through an integrated lens that bridges the macroscopic bearing capacity with mesoscopic mechanical properties. In this study, diverse support types and excavation methods were considered to perform a comprehensive series of loading and failure tests on tunnel anchorage layers. Through the incorporation of stress monitoring, P-wave velocity analysis, and particle image velocimetry (PIV), this study revealed the reinforcement mechanisms of prestressed anchor bolts. In parallel, it delineates the influence of excavation methods on both the macroscopic bearing capacity and mesoscopic mechanical properties of the anchorage layer. The experimental findings revealed that prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement induced a progressive evolution in the surrounding rock, characterized by sequential modifications in stress, integrity, mechanical properties, ductility, and bearing capacity. Relative to the unsupported conditions, the prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement yielded substantial enhancements: stress improved by approximately 245.5%, integrity by 14.3%, mechanical properties by 9.8%, ductility by 147.7%, and bearing capacity by up to 500%. In unsupported conditions or with anchor bolts, large-face excavation demonstrated superior performance relative to full-face excavation, enhancing both the mesoscopic mechanical properties and macroscopic bearing capacity by approximately 2.8%–6.9% and 50%–100%, respectively. The findings indicate that large-face excavation is the preferred method under these support conditions. However, when prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement is used, the differences between the two construction methods become negligible, rendering full-face excavation the more practical construction option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Underground Space
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2025.10.008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bearing capacity and mechanical properties of tunnel anchorage layer under full-face and large-face excavation

Henghong Yang, Zhihui Xu, Jun Liu, Jie Liu et al.
1 citations
Underground Space
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
18.34
article

Bearing capacity and mechanical properties of tunnel anchorage layer under full-face and large-face excavation

Henghong Yang, Zhihui Xu, Jun Liu, Jie Liu, Li Yu, Mingnian Wang, Xiao Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the development of large-scale mechanized construction techniques, tunnel excavation is predominantly executed using either full-face or large-face methods, often supplemented with anchor-bolt reinforcement. However, the reinforcement mechanism of prestressed anchor bolts and the impact of excavation methods on the anchorage layer are yet to be comprehensively clarified through an integrated lens that bridges the macroscopic bearing capacity with mesoscopic mechanical properties. In this study, diverse support types and excavation methods were considered to perform a comprehensive series of loading and failure tests on tunnel anchorage layers. Through the incorporation of stress monitoring, P-wave velocity analysis, and particle image velocimetry (PIV), this study revealed the reinforcement mechanisms of prestressed anchor bolts. In parallel, it delineates the influence of excavation methods on both the macroscopic bearing capacity and mesoscopic mechanical properties of the anchorage layer. The experimental findings revealed that prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement induced a progressive evolution in the surrounding rock, characterized by sequential modifications in stress, integrity, mechanical properties, ductility, and bearing capacity. Relative to the unsupported conditions, the prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement yielded substantial enhancements: stress improved by approximately 245.5%, integrity by 14.3%, mechanical properties by 9.8%, ductility by 147.7%, and bearing capacity by up to 500%. In unsupported conditions or with anchor bolts, large-face excavation demonstrated superior performance relative to full-face excavation, enhancing both the mesoscopic mechanical properties and macroscopic bearing capacity by approximately 2.8%–6.9% and 50%–100%, respectively. The findings indicate that large-face excavation is the preferred method under these support conditions. However, when prestressed anchor-bolt reinforcement is used, the differences between the two construction methods become negligible, rendering full-face excavation the more practical construction option.

Underground SpaceVol. 27
Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
18.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.