Wild boar impact on soil properties in a grassy area: interactions of rooting, slope position and shrub encroachment

Abstract Background Wild boar ( Sus scrofa ) rooting can have diverse effects on soil properties, which could be much more complex to predict in the presence of shrub encroachment and varied microtopography. This study aimed to evaluate the interactive effects of wild boar rooting and shrub encroachment on soil properties in a sloping (2–6°), mildly eroded grassland in Budapest, Hungary. Soil samples were collected from both upper and lower slope positions at 0–5 cm and 5–10 cm depths across four distinct microsites: rooted patches, the redistributed soil surrounding the excavated depressions (“rings”), and two adjacent control patches (open grassy patches and areas beneath shrubs). Using a near-infrared spectrometer, we analyzed pH, total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), exchangeable potassium (K), exchangeable calcium (Ca), exchangeable magnesium (Mg), total iron (Fe) and clay content. Differences among microsites were evaluated using a Bayesian mixed effects regression model. Results Slope position significantly influenced N and P concentrations, with higher values observed at the lower slope than at the upper slope (1.7–2.0 vs. 1.3–1.7 g/kg for N in grassy patches and 28.8–33.2 vs. 22.1–27.7 mg/kg for P in shrub-encroached patches, respectively). Rooted patches exhibited reduced concentrations of N (1.08–1.31 g/kg), P (21.88–25.05 mg/kg) and K (3.70–4.17 mmol/kg), while Fe (23.8–25.0 g/kg) and clay (21.8–23.1%) were elevated. Although vegetation cover may influence nutrient distribution, a significant effect was confirmed only for Ca, which showed higher levels beneath shrubs than in grassy areas at the upper slope. The interaction between slope position and rooting was not a strong predictor in the model, suggesting limited impact of rooting on nutrient retention. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that wild boar rooting significantly alters soil chemical properties, primarily through soil mixing in deep rootings, but their impact may be overridden by slope position. In summary, our results suggest that slope and wild boar rooting influence soil nutrient distribution, but there is little evidence supporting a mitigating role of shrub encroachment or rooting on slope-related erosion impacts. Further conservation efforts in grasslands should consider the joint processes of those factors to prevent soil degradation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Processes
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-025-00669-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wild boar impact on soil properties in a grassy area: interactions of rooting, slope position and shrub encroachment

Csaba Centeri, Ádám Fehér, Krisztián Katona, Natalia Pitta-Osses
1 citations
Ecological Processes
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
29.30
article

Wild boar impact on soil properties in a grassy area: interactions of rooting, slope position and shrub encroachment

Csaba Centeri, Ádám Fehér, Krisztián Katona, Natalia Pitta-Osses
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Wild boar ( Sus scrofa ) rooting can have diverse effects on soil properties, which could be much more complex to predict in the presence of shrub encroachment and varied microtopography. This study aimed to evaluate the interactive effects of wild boar rooting and shrub encroachment on soil properties in a sloping (2–6°), mildly eroded grassland in Budapest, Hungary. Soil samples were collected from both upper and lower slope positions at 0–5 cm and 5–10 cm depths across four distinct microsites: rooted patches, the redistributed soil surrounding the excavated depressions (“rings”), and two adjacent control patches (open grassy patches and areas beneath shrubs). Using a near-infrared spectrometer, we analyzed pH, total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), exchangeable potassium (K), exchangeable calcium (Ca), exchangeable magnesium (Mg), total iron (Fe) and clay content. Differences among microsites were evaluated using a Bayesian mixed effects regression model. Results Slope position significantly influenced N and P concentrations, with higher values observed at the lower slope than at the upper slope (1.7–2.0 vs. 1.3–1.7 g/kg for N in grassy patches and 28.8–33.2 vs. 22.1–27.7 mg/kg for P in shrub-encroached patches, respectively). Rooted patches exhibited reduced concentrations of N (1.08–1.31 g/kg), P (21.88–25.05 mg/kg) and K (3.70–4.17 mmol/kg), while Fe (23.8–25.0 g/kg) and clay (21.8–23.1%) were elevated. Although vegetation cover may influence nutrient distribution, a significant effect was confirmed only for Ca, which showed higher levels beneath shrubs than in grassy areas at the upper slope. The interaction between slope position and rooting was not a strong predictor in the model, suggesting limited impact of rooting on nutrient retention. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that wild boar rooting significantly alters soil chemical properties, primarily through soil mixing in deep rootings, but their impact may be overridden by slope position. In summary, our results suggest that slope and wild boar rooting influence soil nutrient distribution, but there is little evidence supporting a mitigating role of shrub encroachment or rooting on slope-related erosion impacts. Further conservation efforts in grasslands should consider the joint processes of those factors to prevent soil degradation.

Ecological ProcessesVol. 15(1)
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TZ)
Tempus Közalapítvány, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
29.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.