A taxonomy of the process in implementation science: the Global Impact Analytics Framework (GIAF)

The GIAF taxonomy offers a structured, detailed, and flexible toolkit for evaluating implementation processes using mixed methods and across diverse projects and settings. It supports both quantitative scoring and qualitative insight to inform cross-context comparison and learning. By clearly defining and measuring these processes, it enhances the rigour, replicability, and comparability of implementation research and practice. The taxonomy also supports comparative effectiveness analyses of implementation strategies. This comprehensive approach addresses a critical gap in the implementation science field, contributing to stronger evidence-based practices, health and social care programs, and research globally. The GIAF toolkit provides researchers, evaluators, and other decision-makers with a practical resource for assessing implementation impact. It can also support planning processes and, through learnings from assessment results, help improve future implementation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00824-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
138.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A taxonomy of the process in implementation science: the Global Impact Analytics Framework (GIAF)

Beatriz Olaya Guzmán, Germain Weber, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Sebastian Pascal Rosenberg et al.
3 citations
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
138.07
article

A taxonomy of the process in implementation science: the Global Impact Analytics Framework (GIAF)

Beatriz Olaya Guzmán, Germain Weber, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Sebastian Pascal Rosenberg, David Perkins, Carla Sabariego, Kim Bulkeley, Ginny Sargent, Ilaria Montagni, Marleen de Mul, Cindy Woods, Annette Schmiede, Tom Chen, Danny Rock, Federico Alonso-Trujillo, Judit Simon, Jim Gillespie, Guzman Hamilton, John Mendoza, Antoni Serrano, Gill Hilton, Anna Fernandez, Kelvin Hill, GIAF Taxonomy Expert Panel group (group authors), Mencia Ruiz Gutierrez Colosia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The GIAF taxonomy offers a structured, detailed, and flexible toolkit for evaluating implementation processes using mixed methods and across diverse projects and settings. It supports both quantitative scoring and qualitative insight to inform cross-context comparison and learning. By clearly defining and measuring these processes, it enhances the rigour, replicability, and comparability of implementation research and practice. The taxonomy also supports comparative effectiveness analyses of implementation strategies. This comprehensive approach addresses a critical gap in the implementation science field, contributing to stronger evidence-based practices, health and social care programs, and research globally. The GIAF toolkit provides researchers, evaluators, and other decision-makers with a practical resource for assessing implementation impact. It can also support planning processes and, through learnings from assessment results, help improve future implementation efforts.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
University of Canberra (AU), University of Kent (GB), Consejería de Salud y Consumo (ES), Junta de Andalucía (ES)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Health Policy Implementation Science
138.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.