Fixed-Gain and Adaptive Pitch Control for Constant-Speed, Constant-Power Operation of a Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine

This paper addresses Region-3 control of a 2.5 MW three-bladed HAWT using a data-driven workflow that links empirical modeling to implementable pitch control. To focus on fundamental regulation dynamics, the turbine is modeled as a rigid single-mass drivetrain driven by identified quasi-steady aerodynamics. First, we identify a compact shaft-power surface P(ω,V,β) and recover the associated MPP condition, which clarifies why the optimal rotor speed rises with wind and motivates a comparison between capped-MPP operation and constant-speed regulation. We then synthesize a practical Region-3 loop—PI in rate with a first-order pitch servo and saturation handling—and evaluate proportional (P), PI, and PI + servo controllers under sinusoidal and Kaimal-turbulent inflow. Finally, we propose an adaptive PI variant that keeps a fixed acceleration feed-through but retunes the integral path online via ARX(1,1) + RLS to maintain a target closed-loop bandwidth. Performance metrics computed over the full simulation window (t ∈ [0, 50] s) show that P-only control exhibits large steady bias and cap violations; PI recenters speed and power around their targets; adding a pitch servo further trims peaks and ripple. In steady-state turbulent tests, PI + servo achieves tight regulation, Δωpeak ≈ 0.033% (0.079 rad/s), PRMS ≈ 0.62%, while the adaptive PI maintains similar tightness with the lowest variability overall Δωpeak ≈ 0.0104% (0.025 rad/s), PRMS ≈ 0.17. The workflow yields a practically implementable β(V) schedule and a lightweight adaptation mechanism that compensates for slow aerodynamic performance drift without changing the control structure. While structural loads and aeroelastic modes are not explicitly modeled, the proposed controller enforces strict speed and power constraints via a rigid-body dynamic analysis. Extensions to IPC, preview/forecast augmentation, and validation on higher-fidelity aeroelastic/drivetrain models are identified as future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020394
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fixed-Gain and Adaptive Pitch Control for Constant-Speed, Constant-Power Operation of a Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine

Florențiu Deliu, Iancu Ciocioi, Adelina Bordianu, Petrică Popov et al.
Energies
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Fixed-Gain and Adaptive Pitch Control for Constant-Speed, Constant-Power Operation of a Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine

Florențiu Deliu, Iancu Ciocioi, Adelina Bordianu, Petrică Popov, Andrei Darius Deliu, Ciprian Popa, Emil Cazacu
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses Region-3 control of a 2.5 MW three-bladed HAWT using a data-driven workflow that links empirical modeling to implementable pitch control. To focus on fundamental regulation dynamics, the turbine is modeled as a rigid single-mass drivetrain driven by identified quasi-steady aerodynamics. First, we identify a compact shaft-power surface P(ω,V,β) and recover the associated MPP condition, which clarifies why the optimal rotor speed rises with wind and motivates a comparison between capped-MPP operation and constant-speed regulation. We then synthesize a practical Region-3 loop—PI in rate with a first-order pitch servo and saturation handling—and evaluate proportional (P), PI, and PI + servo controllers under sinusoidal and Kaimal-turbulent inflow. Finally, we propose an adaptive PI variant that keeps a fixed acceleration feed-through but retunes the integral path online via ARX(1,1) + RLS to maintain a target closed-loop bandwidth. Performance metrics computed over the full simulation window (t ∈ [0, 50] s) show that P-only control exhibits large steady bias and cap violations; PI recenters speed and power around their targets; adding a pitch servo further trims peaks and ripple. In steady-state turbulent tests, PI + servo achieves tight regulation, Δωpeak ≈ 0.033% (0.079 rad/s), PRMS ≈ 0.62%, while the adaptive PI maintains similar tightness with the lowest variability overall Δωpeak ≈ 0.0104% (0.025 rad/s), PRMS ≈ 0.17. The workflow yields a practically implementable β(V) schedule and a lightweight adaptation mechanism that compensates for slow aerodynamic performance drift without changing the control structure. While structural loads and aeroelastic modes are not explicitly modeled, the proposed controller enforces strict speed and power constraints via a rigid-body dynamic analysis. Extensions to IPC, preview/forecast augmentation, and validation on higher-fidelity aeroelastic/drivetrain models are identified as future work.

EnergiesVol. 19(2)
Mircea cel Batran Naval Academy (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.