Three decades of experience with therapeutic apheresis at a tertiary academic center: review of indications, clinical practice, special age groups and complications

We performed a comprehensive retrospective analysis of 30-year therapeutic apheresis (TA) activity and practices at one a national apheresis center in Slovenia to describe trends and main TA characteristics. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all TA procedures from 1986 to 2016 and extracted indications, vascular access, number of procedures and complications. We compared two time periods (1986–2000 vs. 2001–2016) and analyzed two age subgroups (children and elderly). For the most recent patient cohort (2010 to 2016) we retrieved additional parameters pertaining to each TA procedure. The whole cohort included 1,132 patients who underwent a total of 14,082 apheresis procedures. Central venous catheters were predominantly used, with a trend toward greater use of arterio-venous fistulas in the later period. The number of procedures increased over time. The use of lipid apheresis was stable, and the use of immunoadsorption declined in recent years. The use of apheresis for some indications increased, whereas other indications remained stable over the years. The comparison of the two time periods revealed increased utilization of the TA, increasing patient age, and a shift in vascular access type. In pediatric and elderly patient populations, the indications differed substantially. Chronic apheresis was utilized in a distinct subset of patients. Our analysis confirmed that TA was generally safe and had a low incidence of complications. The most common adverse events were hypotension and mild allergic reactions. Only 0.6% of the procedures were stopped because of a complication. Our study provides valuable insights into TA practices over three decades. This finding underscores the importance of vascular access in apheresis treatment and reaffirms the safety profile of TA across different age groups. Our center’s collaborative approach to providing TA under nephrologist supervision has proven effective in managing changes in the field of apheresis and ensuring patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nephrology
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04750-2
Primary Topic
Complement system in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three decades of experience with therapeutic apheresis at a tertiary academic center: review of indications, clinical practice, special age groups and complications

Karmen Romozi, Milena Andonova, Rafael Ponikvar, Barbara Vajdič Trampuž et al.
BMC Nephrology
Complement system in diseases
article

Three decades of experience with therapeutic apheresis at a tertiary academic center: review of indications, clinical practice, special age groups and complications

Karmen Romozi, Milena Andonova, Rafael Ponikvar, Barbara Vajdič Trampuž, Ana Župunski Čede, Matej Zrimšek, Vanja Peršič, Bojan Medved, Jakob Gubenšek, Denis Fornazaric, Alexander Jerman, Andreja Marn Pernat
article en

Abstract

We performed a comprehensive retrospective analysis of 30-year therapeutic apheresis (TA) activity and practices at one a national apheresis center in Slovenia to describe trends and main TA characteristics. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all TA procedures from 1986 to 2016 and extracted indications, vascular access, number of procedures and complications. We compared two time periods (1986–2000 vs. 2001–2016) and analyzed two age subgroups (children and elderly). For the most recent patient cohort (2010 to 2016) we retrieved additional parameters pertaining to each TA procedure. The whole cohort included 1,132 patients who underwent a total of 14,082 apheresis procedures. Central venous catheters were predominantly used, with a trend toward greater use of arterio-venous fistulas in the later period. The number of procedures increased over time. The use of lipid apheresis was stable, and the use of immunoadsorption declined in recent years. The use of apheresis for some indications increased, whereas other indications remained stable over the years. The comparison of the two time periods revealed increased utilization of the TA, increasing patient age, and a shift in vascular access type. In pediatric and elderly patient populations, the indications differed substantially. Chronic apheresis was utilized in a distinct subset of patients. Our analysis confirmed that TA was generally safe and had a low incidence of complications. The most common adverse events were hypotension and mild allergic reactions. Only 0.6% of the procedures were stopped because of a complication. Our study provides valuable insights into TA practices over three decades. This finding underscores the importance of vascular access in apheresis treatment and reaffirms the safety profile of TA across different age groups. Our center’s collaborative approach to providing TA under nephrologist supervision has proven effective in managing changes in the field of apheresis and ensuring patient safety.

BMC NephrologyVol. 27(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Complement system in diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.