From Worth More to Worth Less: The True Cost of Manufacturing the “Wirthmor” Shirtwaist, 1913–1921

This paper examines the “Wirthmor” method, a management system put forward by the Cleveland-based apparel manufacturer, L. N. Gross Company, in 1913. Founded by Louis Newton Gross in 1898, the company became one of the largest shirtwaist manufacturers in the U.S. In his autobiography, Gross attributed the company's success to his development of the Wirthmor method, claiming that this system allowed the company to reduce 21% of its overall expenditures, while simultaneously offering consumers a garment that's “worth-more.” Despite standardizing the production of women's shirtwaists, the company's success largely relied on hundreds of female garment workers who ultimately lost their jobs once the shirtwaist fell out of fashion, revealing the true cost of a garment thought to be worth more. Overall, this paper shows how early systems of apparel manufacturing, like the Wirthmor method, laid the foundation for structural inequities that continue to shape the fashion industry today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302x251410560
Primary Topic
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Worth More to Worth Less: The True Cost of Manufacturing the “Wirthmor” Shirtwaist, 1913–1921

Lynda May Xepoleas
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
article

From Worth More to Worth Less: The True Cost of Manufacturing the “Wirthmor” Shirtwaist, 1913–1921

Lynda May Xepoleas
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the “Wirthmor” method, a management system put forward by the Cleveland-based apparel manufacturer, L. N. Gross Company, in 1913. Founded by Louis Newton Gross in 1898, the company became one of the largest shirtwaist manufacturers in the U.S. In his autobiography, Gross attributed the company's success to his development of the Wirthmor method, claiming that this system allowed the company to reduce 21% of its overall expenditures, while simultaneously offering consumers a garment that's “worth-more.” Despite standardizing the production of women's shirtwaists, the company's success largely relied on hundreds of female garment workers who ultimately lost their jobs once the shirtwaist fell out of fashion, revealing the true cost of a garment thought to be worth more. Overall, this paper shows how early systems of apparel manufacturing, like the Wirthmor method, laid the foundation for structural inequities that continue to shape the fashion industry today.

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
Kent State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Worth More to Worth Less: The True Cost of Manufacturing the “Wirthmor” Shirtwaist, 1913–1921 — Lynda May Xepoleas · Clothing and Textiles Research Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS