Maximizing Student Research Engagement: Weighing the Impact of Institutional Support on Perceived Gains and Motivation

Despite its recognition as a high-impact practice, including student research in curricula per se is not a guarantee of meaningful research experiences and academic gains. Therefore, this study explored how the quality of institutional support affected students’ perceptions of gains and motivation associated with research. Through bivariate correlational, ordinal logistic regression, and mediation analyses on self-reported data from 212 university students, evidence of the relationship between institutional support and research outcomes was garnered. Notably, the findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the offered research experiences and self-assessed gains in research skills and motivation. The gain ratings progressed proportionately to the evaluation of research experiences. Institutional support emerged as a key predictor of research skills mediated by motivation. While institutional type and academic achievement were not significantly associated with research skills ratings, students from teacher education institutions scored lower on perceived gains. In all, the findings underscore the significance of catering to students with high-quality, accessible research experiences to enhance their academic and professional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Teaching and Learning
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v20i1.9479
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximizing Student Research Engagement: Weighing the Impact of Institutional Support on Perceived Gains and Motivation

Mykhailo Povidaichyk, Marianna Lőrincz
Journal of Teaching and Learning
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Maximizing Student Research Engagement: Weighing the Impact of Institutional Support on Perceived Gains and Motivation

Mykhailo Povidaichyk, Marianna Lőrincz
article en

Abstract

Despite its recognition as a high-impact practice, including student research in curricula per se is not a guarantee of meaningful research experiences and academic gains. Therefore, this study explored how the quality of institutional support affected students’ perceptions of gains and motivation associated with research. Through bivariate correlational, ordinal logistic regression, and mediation analyses on self-reported data from 212 university students, evidence of the relationship between institutional support and research outcomes was garnered. Notably, the findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the offered research experiences and self-assessed gains in research skills and motivation. The gain ratings progressed proportionately to the evaluation of research experiences. Institutional support emerged as a key predictor of research skills mediated by motivation. While institutional type and academic achievement were not significantly associated with research skills ratings, students from teacher education institutions scored lower on perceived gains. In all, the findings underscore the significance of catering to students with high-quality, accessible research experiences to enhance their academic and professional development.

Journal of Teaching and LearningVol. 20(1)
Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University (UA), Uzhhorod National University (UA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.