Accuracy of Fully Guided Implant Placement Using Bone-Supported Stackable Surgical Guides in Completely Edentulous Patients—A Retrospective Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Precise implant positioning is critical for successful prosthetic rehabilitation, particularly in completely edentulous patients where anatomical landmarks are lost. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of implant placement in the edentulous maxilla and mandible using computer-assisted planning and a bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective clinical study included 15 completely edentulous patients who received a total of 60 implants. A dual-scan protocol was utilized for planning. The surgical protocol involved a base guide fixed to the bone with pins, serving as a rigid foundation for stackable components used for osteotomy and implant insertion. Postoperative CBCT scans were superimposed onto the preoperative plan to calculate angular deviations, 3D linear deviations at the implant neck and apex, and depth deviations. <b>Results</b>: The analysis demonstrated high accuracy with a mean angular deviation of 1.25° ± 0.80°. The mean 3D linear deviation was 0.96 ± 0.57 mm at the implant neck and 1.07 ± 0.56 mm at the apex. Depth deviation showed a mean discrepancy of 0.37 ± 0.58 mm. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the pre-established clinical safety thresholds. <b>Conclusions</b>: Within the limitations of this study, the bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol proved to be a highly accurate method for full-arch rehabilitation. By eliminating mucosal resilience and ensuring rigid fixation, this approach enables predictable implant placement and facilitates the passive fit of screw-retained bar-supported prostheses, representing a reliable alternative to dynamic navigation in daily clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020652
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Fully Guided Implant Placement Using Bone-Supported Stackable Surgical Guides in Completely Edentulous Patients—A Retrospective Study

Tomislav Katanec, Roko Bjelica, Marko Vuletić, Igor Smojver et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Accuracy of Fully Guided Implant Placement Using Bone-Supported Stackable Surgical Guides in Completely Edentulous Patients—A Retrospective Study

Tomislav Katanec, Roko Bjelica, Marko Vuletić, Igor Smojver, D. Gabric, Luka Stojić
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Precise implant positioning is critical for successful prosthetic rehabilitation, particularly in completely edentulous patients where anatomical landmarks are lost. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of implant placement in the edentulous maxilla and mandible using computer-assisted planning and a bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective clinical study included 15 completely edentulous patients who received a total of 60 implants. A dual-scan protocol was utilized for planning. The surgical protocol involved a base guide fixed to the bone with pins, serving as a rigid foundation for stackable components used for osteotomy and implant insertion. Postoperative CBCT scans were superimposed onto the preoperative plan to calculate angular deviations, 3D linear deviations at the implant neck and apex, and depth deviations. <b>Results</b>: The analysis demonstrated high accuracy with a mean angular deviation of 1.25° ± 0.80°. The mean 3D linear deviation was 0.96 ± 0.57 mm at the implant neck and 1.07 ± 0.56 mm at the apex. Depth deviation showed a mean discrepancy of 0.37 ± 0.58 mm. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the pre-established clinical safety thresholds. <b>Conclusions</b>: Within the limitations of this study, the bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol proved to be a highly accurate method for full-arch rehabilitation. By eliminating mucosal resilience and ensuring rigid fixation, this approach enables predictable implant placement and facilitates the passive fit of screw-retained bar-supported prostheses, representing a reliable alternative to dynamic navigation in daily clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), University of Zagreb (HR), Zdravstveni centar (RS), Institute of Art History (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.