A Nonparametric Approach to Practical Identifiability of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models

Mathematical modelling is a widely used approach to understand and interpret clinical trial data. This modelling typically involves fitting mechanistic mathematical models to data from individual trial participants. Despite the widespread adoption of this individual-based fitting, it is becoming increasingly common to take a hierarchical approach to parameter estimation, where modellers characterize the population parameter distributions, rather than considering each individual independently. This hierarchical parameter estimation is standard in pharmacometric modelling. However, many of the existing techniques for parameter identifiability do not immediately translate from the individual-based fitting to the hierarchical setting. In this work, we propose a nonparametric approach to study practical identifiability within a hierarchical parameter estimation framework. We focus on the commonly used nonlinear mixed effects framework and investigate two well-studied examples from the pharmacometrics and viral dynamics literature to illustrate the potential utility of our approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01583-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Nonparametric Approach to Practical Identifiability of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models

Stuart T. Johnston, Ryan J. Murphy, Imke Botha, Jennifer A. Flegg et al.
1 citations
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
41.27
article

A Nonparametric Approach to Practical Identifiability of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models

Stuart T. Johnston, Ryan J. Murphy, Imke Botha, Jennifer A. Flegg, T. Cassidy, Sara Hamis, Michael Plank
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mathematical modelling is a widely used approach to understand and interpret clinical trial data. This modelling typically involves fitting mechanistic mathematical models to data from individual trial participants. Despite the widespread adoption of this individual-based fitting, it is becoming increasingly common to take a hierarchical approach to parameter estimation, where modellers characterize the population parameter distributions, rather than considering each individual independently. This hierarchical parameter estimation is standard in pharmacometric modelling. However, many of the existing techniques for parameter identifiability do not immediately translate from the individual-based fitting to the hierarchical setting. In this work, we propose a nonparametric approach to study practical identifiability within a hierarchical parameter estimation framework. We focus on the commonly used nonlinear mixed effects framework and investigate two well-studied examples from the pharmacometrics and viral dynamics literature to illustrate the potential utility of our approach.

Bulletin of Mathematical BiologyVol. 88(2)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Leeds (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of South Australia (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ)
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna, London Mathematical Society, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
41.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.