Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer screening in a federally qualified health center: Provider and staff perspectives

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated policies discouraging routine-care visits dramatically affected cancer screening in the United States. Yet little is known about the perspectives of providers and staff at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during this period. We administered hour-long telephone interviews with clinic leadership and frontline staff at a Los Angeles-based FQHC. Questions explored barriers and facilitators to CRC screening, and adaptations implemented to address challenges posed during three phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: early (March-July 2020), middle (August - December 2020), and later (January - December 2021). All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content-analyzed by trained and experienced qualitative methodologists. Participants' (n = 20) ages ranged from 26-56; most were female (85%), and in leadership positions (65%). Early in the pandemic CRC screening efforts were severely hampered as the health center was inundated with upper respiratory infections, lacked infrastructure to rapidly scale telehealth, and had minimal guidance from prior disaster plans geared for short-term challenges (e.g., flu). Limited availability of stool test kits and reduced gastroenterology capacity also thwarted CRC screening delivery. Throughout the pandemic, the FQHC faced challenges hiring and retaining staff for cancer screening outreach. In the later phase of the pandemic, the FQHC responded by expanding CRC screening options, deploying health record tools enabling automated outreach, and retraining staff on CRC screening workflows. Interviewees identified strategies to strengthen pandemic preparedness and sustain CRC screening, including improved monitoring of infectious disease through incoming patient call data to guide staffing decisions, diversifying vendor relationships and specialty care partnerships to ensure access, particularly in gastroenterology, and increasing home-based testing options. Our findings, while limited to the experience of one large FQHC, may help inform efforts to develop guidance that community health centers can apply in responding to future pandemics or other natural disasters to minimize impacts on CRC screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340184
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer screening in a federally qualified health center: Provider and staff perspectives

Anne L. Escaron, Joanna Garcia, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Rebecca M. Crocker et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
24.20
article

Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer screening in a federally qualified health center: Provider and staff perspectives

Anne L. Escaron, Joanna Garcia, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Rebecca M. Crocker, Gloria D. Coronado, Jennifer L. Schneider, Alexis Rodriguez, Robert Lara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated policies discouraging routine-care visits dramatically affected cancer screening in the United States. Yet little is known about the perspectives of providers and staff at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during this period. We administered hour-long telephone interviews with clinic leadership and frontline staff at a Los Angeles-based FQHC. Questions explored barriers and facilitators to CRC screening, and adaptations implemented to address challenges posed during three phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: early (March-July 2020), middle (August - December 2020), and later (January - December 2021). All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content-analyzed by trained and experienced qualitative methodologists. Participants' (n = 20) ages ranged from 26-56; most were female (85%), and in leadership positions (65%). Early in the pandemic CRC screening efforts were severely hampered as the health center was inundated with upper respiratory infections, lacked infrastructure to rapidly scale telehealth, and had minimal guidance from prior disaster plans geared for short-term challenges (e.g., flu). Limited availability of stool test kits and reduced gastroenterology capacity also thwarted CRC screening delivery. Throughout the pandemic, the FQHC faced challenges hiring and retaining staff for cancer screening outreach. In the later phase of the pandemic, the FQHC responded by expanding CRC screening options, deploying health record tools enabling automated outreach, and retraining staff on CRC screening workflows. Interviewees identified strategies to strengthen pandemic preparedness and sustain CRC screening, including improved monitoring of infectious disease through incoming patient call data to guide staffing decisions, diversifying vendor relationships and specialty care partnerships to ensure access, particularly in gastroenterology, and increasing home-based testing options. Our findings, while limited to the experience of one large FQHC, may help inform efforts to develop guidance that community health centers can apply in responding to future pandemics or other natural disasters to minimize impacts on CRC screening.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(1)
University of Arizona (US), Arizona Science Center (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), AltaMed (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.