Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance and Validation of an AI-Assisted Fluorescence Imaging Device for Fecal Egg Counts Against the Manual McMaster Reference Method in Kiko Male Goats

Gastrointestinal parasites are a major health and economic concern in small ruminants. The classic microscopic approach using the manual McMaster method serves to quantitatively count parasite eggs, which are labor-intensive and prone to variation. Artificial intelligence-based systems (Parasight<sup>®</sup>, powered by Fecalsight AI™) could provide quicker and more objective alternatives; therefore, independent validation is necessary before clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement, classification consistency, and diagnostic performance of Parasight<sup>®</sup> relative to the manual McMaster method, with a focus on its suitability as a screening and decision-support tool. Fecal samples from 44 Kiko goats over 3 sampling times were analyzed using both methods, with manual counts performed independently by 2 observers. Agreement between methods was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and Cohen's Kappa for categorical classification. Diagnostic performance for identifying animals exceeding the clinical treatment threshold (>1000 eggs per gram) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and regression modeling was used to characterize associations between methods. Manual observers showed high reliability, confirming the suitability of the McMaster method as a reference. Compared with manual counts, Parasight<sup>®</sup> consistently underestimated egg counts, resulting in poor-to-moderate absolute agreement; however, it reliably ranked animals by parasite burden and showed excellent discrimination for identifying animals above the treatment threshold (AUC = 0.90-0.96). Regression analyses further demonstrated linear or curvilinear associations depending on egg counts. Overall, the Parasight<sup>®</sup> device reliably captured relative parasite burden but required a lower operational threshold to match manual treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16020248
Primary Topic
Helminth infection and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance and Validation of an AI-Assisted Fluorescence Imaging Device for Fecal Egg Counts Against the Manual McMaster Reference Method in Kiko Male Goats

Alireza Rahmani Shahraki, Fiona P. Maunsell, Brittany N. Diehl, Ahmadreza Mirzaei
Animals
Helminth infection and control
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance and Validation of an AI-Assisted Fluorescence Imaging Device for Fecal Egg Counts Against the Manual McMaster Reference Method in Kiko Male Goats

Alireza Rahmani Shahraki, Fiona P. Maunsell, Brittany N. Diehl, Ahmadreza Mirzaei
article en

Abstract

Gastrointestinal parasites are a major health and economic concern in small ruminants. The classic microscopic approach using the manual McMaster method serves to quantitatively count parasite eggs, which are labor-intensive and prone to variation. Artificial intelligence-based systems (Parasight<sup>®</sup>, powered by Fecalsight AI™) could provide quicker and more objective alternatives; therefore, independent validation is necessary before clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement, classification consistency, and diagnostic performance of Parasight<sup>®</sup> relative to the manual McMaster method, with a focus on its suitability as a screening and decision-support tool. Fecal samples from 44 Kiko goats over 3 sampling times were analyzed using both methods, with manual counts performed independently by 2 observers. Agreement between methods was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and Cohen's Kappa for categorical classification. Diagnostic performance for identifying animals exceeding the clinical treatment threshold (>1000 eggs per gram) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and regression modeling was used to characterize associations between methods. Manual observers showed high reliability, confirming the suitability of the McMaster method as a reference. Compared with manual counts, Parasight<sup>®</sup> consistently underestimated egg counts, resulting in poor-to-moderate absolute agreement; however, it reliably ranked animals by parasite burden and showed excellent discrimination for identifying animals above the treatment threshold (AUC = 0.90-0.96). Regression analyses further demonstrated linear or curvilinear associations depending on egg counts. Overall, the Parasight<sup>®</sup> device reliably captured relative parasite burden but required a lower operational threshold to match manual treatment decisions.

AnimalsVol. 16(2)
University of Florida (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Helminth infection and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.