Human Factors, Competencies, and System Interaction in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
Research into Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPASs) has expanded rapidly, yet the competencies, knowledge, skills, and other attributes (KSaOs) required of RPAS pilots remain comparatively underexamined. This review consolidates existing studies addressing human performance, subject matter expertise, training practices, and accident causation to provide a comprehensive account of the KSaOs underpinning safe civilian and commercial drone operations. Prior research demonstrates that early work drew heavily on military contexts, which may not generalize to contemporary civilian operations characterized by smaller platforms, single-pilot tasks, and diverse industry applications. Studies employing subject matter experts highlight cognitive demands in areas such as situational awareness, workload management, planning, fatigue recognition, perceptual acuity, and decision-making. Accident analyses, predominantly using the human factors accident classification system and related taxonomies, show that skill errors and preconditions for unsafe acts are the most frequent contributors to RPAS occurrences, with limited evidence of higher-level latent organizational factors in civilian contexts. Emerging research emphasizes that RPAS pilots increasingly perform data-collection tasks integral to professional workflows, requiring competencies beyond aircraft handling alone. The review identifies significant gaps in training specificity, selection processes, and taxonomy suitability, indicating opportunities for future research to refine RPAS competency frameworks and support improved operational safety.
Authors
- Graham Wild (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1223-4675)
- John Murray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9580-3572)
Institutions
- University of Canberra (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Aerospace
- Published
- 2026-01-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13010085
- Primary Topic
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Australian Government