Navigating Conflicting Vaccination Recommendations

This Perspective discusses how clinicians can navigate conflicting vaccination recommendations following revisions from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.0276
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Conflicting Vaccination Recommendations

Brennan Ta, Michelle M. Mello, Michael T. Osterholm, Rochelle P. Walensky
1 citations
JAMA
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
58.49
article

Navigating Conflicting Vaccination Recommendations

Brennan Ta, Michelle M. Mello, Michael T. Osterholm, Rochelle P. Walensky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This Perspective discusses how clinicians can navigate conflicting vaccination recommendations following revisions from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

JAMAVol. 335(10)
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Minneapolis VA Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
58.49
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.