KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

<b>Background</b>: Mutations in the <i>KRAS</i> gene play a pivotal role in lung cancer development and progression and are becoming increasingly important in therapeutic decision-making. The detection of these mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive diagnostic approach. However, the accuracy reported in different studies varies widely. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Eligible studies evaluated the detection of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in ctDNA in plasma or serum for lung cancer diagnosis and reported sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. Primary pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated using aggregated 2 × 2 contingency tables. Additionally, a bivariate random-effects model was applied in a secondary analysis to investigate between-study heterogeneity. <b>Results</b>: Nine diagnostic study arms comprising 691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Across all datasets, there were 255 true positives, 19 false positives, 136 false negatives, and 281 true negatives. The pooled sensitivity was 65.2%, while the pooled specificity was 93.7%. The positive likelihood ratio was 10.35, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.37, resulting in a diagnostic odds ratio of 28.0, which indicates strong rule-in capability. Sensitivity showed moderate heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, specificity demonstrated minimal heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions</b>: ctDNA-based detection of <i>KRAS</i> mutations demonstrates high specificity but moderate sensitivity for diagnosing lung cancer. These findings suggest that a <i>KRAS</i> liquid biopsy could be a valuable complementary diagnostic tool, particularly when a tissue biopsy is not possible or is inadequate, and it could support more personalized decision-making as analytical technologies continue to advance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020250
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Łukasz Gąsiorowski, Karolina Buszka, Agata Kolecka-Bednarczyk, Claudia Dompé et al.
Cancers
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Łukasz Gąsiorowski, Karolina Buszka, Agata Kolecka-Bednarczyk, Claudia Dompé, Anna Szulta, Joanna Budna-Tukan, Michał Nowicki
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Mutations in the <i>KRAS</i> gene play a pivotal role in lung cancer development and progression and are becoming increasingly important in therapeutic decision-making. The detection of these mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive diagnostic approach. However, the accuracy reported in different studies varies widely. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Eligible studies evaluated the detection of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in ctDNA in plasma or serum for lung cancer diagnosis and reported sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. Primary pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated using aggregated 2 × 2 contingency tables. Additionally, a bivariate random-effects model was applied in a secondary analysis to investigate between-study heterogeneity. <b>Results</b>: Nine diagnostic study arms comprising 691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Across all datasets, there were 255 true positives, 19 false positives, 136 false negatives, and 281 true negatives. The pooled sensitivity was 65.2%, while the pooled specificity was 93.7%. The positive likelihood ratio was 10.35, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.37, resulting in a diagnostic odds ratio of 28.0, which indicates strong rule-in capability. Sensitivity showed moderate heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, specificity demonstrated minimal heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions</b>: ctDNA-based detection of <i>KRAS</i> mutations demonstrates high specificity but moderate sensitivity for diagnosing lung cancer. These findings suggest that a <i>KRAS</i> liquid biopsy could be a valuable complementary diagnostic tool, particularly when a tissue biopsy is not possible or is inadequate, and it could support more personalized decision-making as analytical technologies continue to advance.

CancersVol. 18(2)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), University of Zielona Góra (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.