Better Inputs, Better Learning: A Peptide Embedding Tutorial for Proteomic Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry proteomics creates complex data representing the peptide/protein contents of biological samples. Various types of machine learning have been central to computational methods used to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra and numerous other aspects of the data analysis process. As deep learning has emerged as a powerful machine learning method for modeling and interpreting data, computational proteomics researchers have leveraged large publicly available data sets to train machine learning models to predict peptide fragmentation spectra and liquid chromatography retention time. Resources like proteomicsML offer extensive demonstrative tutorials for these learning tasks and are closing the gap between the proteomics and machine learning communities. However, in these and other educational materials on deep learning, the critical step of preparing data for learning is frequently omitted. Prior to learning, peptide strings must be converted into a numeric format─an embedding. There are many different peptide embeddings, and some vastly outperform others. Yet the process for creating an embedding, and also the rationale for choosing a specific embedding, is rarely discussed in our proteomics literature. In this technical note, we introduce four Google Colab notebooks to teach peptide embeddings. The series walks users through five different peptide-embedding strategies─ from simplistic single-number encodings to state-of-the-art pretrained embeddings─ through both code examples and narrative descriptions. The final notebook compares the five embeddings in a head-to-head benchmark. By making these notebooks free, we hope to lower the barrier for researchers who want to bring modern deep learning into their proteomics workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00563
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better Inputs, Better Learning: A Peptide Embedding Tutorial for Proteomic Mass Spectrometry

A. Nilsson, Luke Squires, Jose Humberto Giraldez Chavez, Samuel Harris Payne et al.
Journal of Proteome Research
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Better Inputs, Better Learning: A Peptide Embedding Tutorial for Proteomic Mass Spectrometry

A. Nilsson, Luke Squires, Jose Humberto Giraldez Chavez, Samuel Harris Payne, Lukas Käll
article en

Abstract

Mass spectrometry proteomics creates complex data representing the peptide/protein contents of biological samples. Various types of machine learning have been central to computational methods used to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra and numerous other aspects of the data analysis process. As deep learning has emerged as a powerful machine learning method for modeling and interpreting data, computational proteomics researchers have leveraged large publicly available data sets to train machine learning models to predict peptide fragmentation spectra and liquid chromatography retention time. Resources like proteomicsML offer extensive demonstrative tutorials for these learning tasks and are closing the gap between the proteomics and machine learning communities. However, in these and other educational materials on deep learning, the critical step of preparing data for learning is frequently omitted. Prior to learning, peptide strings must be converted into a numeric format─an embedding. There are many different peptide embeddings, and some vastly outperform others. Yet the process for creating an embedding, and also the rationale for choosing a specific embedding, is rarely discussed in our proteomics literature. In this technical note, we introduce four Google Colab notebooks to teach peptide embeddings. The series walks users through five different peptide-embedding strategies─ from simplistic single-number encodings to state-of-the-art pretrained embeddings─ through both code examples and narrative descriptions. The final notebook compares the five embeddings in a head-to-head benchmark. By making these notebooks free, we hope to lower the barrier for researchers who want to bring modern deep learning into their proteomics workflows.

Journal of Proteome ResearchVol. 25(2)
Brigham Young University (US), Science for Life Laboratory (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.