A comparative evaluation of six Monte Carlo-based software tools for fetal dose estimation from CT examinations

Accurate estimation of fetal dose during computed tomography (CT) examinations is essential to ensure fetal safety. This study presents a comparative analysis of six Monte Carlo software tools (VirtualDose CT, FetalDose.org, CODE, Waza-ari, ImPACT, and CT-Expo) for fetal dose estimation across various CT examinations, representing the largest number of tools assessed to date. By integrating reliability analysis with performance evaluation, the study improves the selection of fetal dose software tools in radiology practice. The tools were used to estimate fetal doses for 26 pregnant participants who underwent 27 CT examinations. Single and average measures intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were calculated to assess both collective and pairwise reliability. Agreement between the most reliable tool pair was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot. Performance comparative analysis for the software tools in estimating fetal dose from CT was conducted via a weighted scoring method, considering accuracy, safety, and usability. The average measures ICC for all tools was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91 - 0.98), indicating excellent overall reliability, while the single measures ICC value of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63 - 0.90) reflected moderate to excellent reliability of an individual software tool with the others. VirtualDose CT and FetalDose.org showed the highest single measures ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 - 0.99), demonstrating a high reliability between both tools. The Bland-Altman analysis for these two tools showed a mean difference of 0.79 and limits of confidence from -2.45 to 4.03, indicating a good agreement and further confirming their reliability. In terms of performance comparative analysis, VirtualDose CT outperformed the other tools with a total score of 485.25 based on the evaluation criteria. In conclusion, VirtualDose CT is recommended as the preferred software for fetal dose estimation in CT examinations due to its superior performance and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiological Protection
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae3774
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative evaluation of six Monte Carlo-based software tools for fetal dose estimation from CT examinations

Adnan Lahham, Huda Nasser
Journal of Radiological Protection
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

A comparative evaluation of six Monte Carlo-based software tools for fetal dose estimation from CT examinations

Adnan Lahham, Huda Nasser
article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of fetal dose during computed tomography (CT) examinations is essential to ensure fetal safety. This study presents a comparative analysis of six Monte Carlo software tools (VirtualDose CT, FetalDose.org, CODE, Waza-ari, ImPACT, and CT-Expo) for fetal dose estimation across various CT examinations, representing the largest number of tools assessed to date. By integrating reliability analysis with performance evaluation, the study improves the selection of fetal dose software tools in radiology practice. The tools were used to estimate fetal doses for 26 pregnant participants who underwent 27 CT examinations. Single and average measures intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were calculated to assess both collective and pairwise reliability. Agreement between the most reliable tool pair was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot. Performance comparative analysis for the software tools in estimating fetal dose from CT was conducted via a weighted scoring method, considering accuracy, safety, and usability. The average measures ICC for all tools was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91 - 0.98), indicating excellent overall reliability, while the single measures ICC value of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63 - 0.90) reflected moderate to excellent reliability of an individual software tool with the others. VirtualDose CT and FetalDose.org showed the highest single measures ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 - 0.99), demonstrating a high reliability between both tools. The Bland-Altman analysis for these two tools showed a mean difference of 0.79 and limits of confidence from -2.45 to 4.03, indicating a good agreement and further confirming their reliability. In terms of performance comparative analysis, VirtualDose CT outperformed the other tools with a total score of 485.25 based on the evaluation criteria. In conclusion, VirtualDose CT is recommended as the preferred software for fetal dose estimation in CT examinations due to its superior performance and reliability.

Journal of Radiological ProtectionVol. 46(1)
Al-Quds University (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative evaluation of six Monte Carlo-based software tools for fetal dose estimation from CT examinations — Adnan Lahham, Huda Nasser · Journal of Radiological Protection (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS