Institutionalization of artificial intelligence: an interdisciplinary aspect

This interdisciplinary study, at the intersection of political science, philosophy, sociology, and political anthropology, examines new issues in public administration and public self-regulation associated with the emergence of artificial intelligence. The purpose of this work is to determine the basic principles and directions of institutionalization of artificial intelligence, as well as state and public management of these processes. Among the tasks we will note the definition of the initial principle for constructing a working hypothesis and choosing an adequate methodology; verification of the applicability of the methodology of moral and religious neoinstitutionalism to the problem of artificial intelligence; determination of the factors enhancing Homo technicus; Identifying the risks of digitalization; identifying the greatest threat posed by artificial intelligence; formulating the basic principles for managing artificial intelligence by society (the "Ten Commandments of Artificial Intelligence").The creation of artificial intelligence offers new technical possibilities, but simultaneously increases risks, threatening the very essence of human society. Preserving the essence of humanity, as expressed in the Homo traditum model, requires a new ideology that limits the risks posed by technocracy. The study utilizes a comprehensive methodology of moral and religious neo-institutionalism. It is based on the principles of anthropologism, systemicity, balance, and morality. The theoretical significance of the study: introduction to the political science analysis of the terms Homo technicus, Homo traditum and the application of the methodology of moral and religious neoinstitutionalism to the problem of artificial intelligence. The book analyzes the factors that give rise to Homo technicus and the risks of the digital economy. The practical significance of the work lies in identifying the main risks to humanity posed by artificial intelligence and formulating the "ten commandments of artificial intelligence."

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Research
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2026-9-4-3-27
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutionalization of artificial intelligence: an interdisciplinary aspect

Nikolay Privalov
Journal of Political Research
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Institutionalization of artificial intelligence: an interdisciplinary aspect

Nikolay Privalov
article en

Abstract

This interdisciplinary study, at the intersection of political science, philosophy, sociology, and political anthropology, examines new issues in public administration and public self-regulation associated with the emergence of artificial intelligence. The purpose of this work is to determine the basic principles and directions of institutionalization of artificial intelligence, as well as state and public management of these processes. Among the tasks we will note the definition of the initial principle for constructing a working hypothesis and choosing an adequate methodology; verification of the applicability of the methodology of moral and religious neoinstitutionalism to the problem of artificial intelligence; determination of the factors enhancing Homo technicus; Identifying the risks of digitalization; identifying the greatest threat posed by artificial intelligence; formulating the basic principles for managing artificial intelligence by society (the "Ten Commandments of Artificial Intelligence").The creation of artificial intelligence offers new technical possibilities, but simultaneously increases risks, threatening the very essence of human society. Preserving the essence of humanity, as expressed in the Homo traditum model, requires a new ideology that limits the risks posed by technocracy. The study utilizes a comprehensive methodology of moral and religious neo-institutionalism. It is based on the principles of anthropologism, systemicity, balance, and morality. The theoretical significance of the study: introduction to the political science analysis of the terms Homo technicus, Homo traditum and the application of the methodology of moral and religious neoinstitutionalism to the problem of artificial intelligence. The book analyzes the factors that give rise to Homo technicus and the risks of the digital economy. The practical significance of the work lies in identifying the main risks to humanity posed by artificial intelligence and formulating the "ten commandments of artificial intelligence."

Journal of Political ResearchVol. 9(4)
Russian State University of Justice (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutionalization of artificial intelligence: an interdisciplinary aspect — Nikolay Privalov · Journal of Political Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS