The Future of Food Processing—A Food Science and Technology Perspective. Proceedings of a Roundtable Event

Rising interest in the links between processed food consumption and poor health outcomes often overlooks the perspectives of those working in food technology and innovation. To address this, a virtual roundtable was held in October 2024 to provide a setting for a technical discussion among those working in food processing, technology and engineering and related fields. The aims were to explore whether (a) the concept of ultra-processed foods (UPF) as a whole (or any elements thereof) may be useful to consider in the development of healthier and more sustainable foods, including its strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and barriers; and (b) where there might be opportunities for food technologists to improve current approaches to food processing for human health in the future. Presentations focussed on reformulation and included a critique of the evidence and proposed mechanisms linking UPF consumption to food intake and health. Areas of discussion included use and replacement of ingredients deemed to be 'UPF'; material properties of foods; advances in food production; consumer communication; practicalities of consuming a healthy, sustainable diet; food systems considerations; environmental sustainability in food processing and the role of meat alternatives. Looking ahead, participants identified opportunities for improvements centred around four themes: target areas and considerations for innovation and reformulation that can be suggested based on current or future capability; potential definitions/targets that industry can work towards to improve the healthiness of products and related evidence needs; greater transdisciplinary working (cross-sector, food systems approaches); consumer-related issues and potential policy/regulatory changes. Caution was expressed around both 'overprocessing' and misplaced reformulation efforts to the detriment of health. However, a potential role for consumer education around food processing techniques and ingredients was identified and the importance of continued advancements in food processing and technology in the production of healthier, sustainable food was highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Bulletin
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70043
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Food Processing—A Food Science and Technology Perspective. Proceedings of a Roundtable Event

Cathrina H. Edwards, Yrjö H. Roos, S. Lockyer, Ciaran Gerard Forde et al.
Nutrition Bulletin
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The Future of Food Processing—A Food Science and Technology Perspective. Proceedings of a Roundtable Event

Cathrina H. Edwards, Yrjö H. Roos, S. Lockyer, Ciaran Gerard Forde, Keshavan Niranjan, Gleb E. Yakubov, Caroline Millman, Stephen French, Anthony Warner, Michael Adams, Timothy Foster, Christine Williams
article en

Abstract

Rising interest in the links between processed food consumption and poor health outcomes often overlooks the perspectives of those working in food technology and innovation. To address this, a virtual roundtable was held in October 2024 to provide a setting for a technical discussion among those working in food processing, technology and engineering and related fields. The aims were to explore whether (a) the concept of ultra-processed foods (UPF) as a whole (or any elements thereof) may be useful to consider in the development of healthier and more sustainable foods, including its strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and barriers; and (b) where there might be opportunities for food technologists to improve current approaches to food processing for human health in the future. Presentations focussed on reformulation and included a critique of the evidence and proposed mechanisms linking UPF consumption to food intake and health. Areas of discussion included use and replacement of ingredients deemed to be 'UPF'; material properties of foods; advances in food production; consumer communication; practicalities of consuming a healthy, sustainable diet; food systems considerations; environmental sustainability in food processing and the role of meat alternatives. Looking ahead, participants identified opportunities for improvements centred around four themes: target areas and considerations for innovation and reformulation that can be suggested based on current or future capability; potential definitions/targets that industry can work towards to improve the healthiness of products and related evidence needs; greater transdisciplinary working (cross-sector, food systems approaches); consumer-related issues and potential policy/regulatory changes. Caution was expressed around both 'overprocessing' and misplaced reformulation efforts to the detriment of health. However, a potential role for consumer education around food processing techniques and ingredients was identified and the importance of continued advancements in food processing and technology in the production of healthier, sustainable food was highlighted.

Nutrition BulletinVol. 51(1)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), British Nutrition Foundation (GB), University College Cork (IE), Quadram Institute (GB), Campden BRI (United Kingdom) (GB), Institute of Food Science & Technology (GB), C-Tech Innovation (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Reading (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
PepsiCo, Mars, Danone, Department of Health and Social Care, British Nutrition Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.