Comparison of pulse field ablation versus cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy
PFA offers advantages in procedural time and contrast medium use. Complication rate for PFA and CBA was similar except for PNP which exclusively occurred in CBA.
Authors
- Budi Baktijasa Dharmadjati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-3801)
- Wynne Widiarti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2045-5689)
- Firas Farisi Alkaff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-1345)
- Chaq El Chaq Zamzam Multazam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-8788)
- Pandit Bagus Tri Saputra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-0592)
- Ali Mustofa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-6117)
- Sunu Budhi Raharjo
- Rerdin Julario
- Makhyan Jibril Al-Farabi
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Universitas Airlangga (ID)
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Lung Institute (US)
- Universitas Dr. Soetomo (ID)
- Imperial College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2609321
- Primary Topic
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00