Surgical Timing and Survival in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the PARP Inhibitor Era

<b>Background:</b> The optimal timing of cytoreductive surgery for advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) remains a critical unmet question in the modern era of platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance. To address this gap, we compared outcomes following primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus interval debulking surgery (IDS) in a uniformly treated, contemporary cohort. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with FIGO stage IIIB-IVB HGSC treated between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline tumor burden was assessed using detailed radiologic and laparoscopic evaluations, including both presurgical and intraoperative assessments. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Subgroup analyses were rigorously conducted according to residual disease status and <i>BRCA</i> mutation status. <b>Results:</b> Among 221 patients (PDS, <i>n</i> = 60; IDS, <i>n</i> = 151), the median follow-up was 40 months. In the overall cohort, adjusted PFS and OS did not differ significantly between the PDS and IDS groups (PFS: aHR, 1.15; 95%CI, 0.67-1.98; OS: aHR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.54-2.83). Outcomes were comparable among patients achieving R0 resection. Notably, <i>BRCA</i>-mutated patients demonstrated a substantial survival advantage with PDS (<i>BRCA</i>-mutated PFS: aHR, 3.34; 95%CI, 1.06-16.67; OS: aHR, 6.07; 95%CI, 2.13-∞), whereas <i>BRCA</i> wild-type patients showed no significant difference between surgical strategies. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that BRCA-mutated patients may derive a survival benefit from PDS, whereas surgical timing had a limited impact on BRCA wild-type disease. This result underscores the importance of integrating molecular profiling, particularly <i>BRCA</i> mutation status, with surgical assessment to guide optimal and personalized treatment strategies in the PARPi era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020245
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Timing and Survival in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the PARP Inhibitor Era

Makiko Omi, Hiroyuki Kanao, Motoko Kanno, Sachiho Netsu et al.
Cancers
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Surgical Timing and Survival in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the PARP Inhibitor Era

Makiko Omi, Hiroyuki Kanao, Motoko Kanno, Sachiho Netsu, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayu Yunokawa, Hidetaka Nomura, Risako Ozawa, Yoichi Aoki
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The optimal timing of cytoreductive surgery for advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) remains a critical unmet question in the modern era of platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance. To address this gap, we compared outcomes following primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus interval debulking surgery (IDS) in a uniformly treated, contemporary cohort. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with FIGO stage IIIB-IVB HGSC treated between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline tumor burden was assessed using detailed radiologic and laparoscopic evaluations, including both presurgical and intraoperative assessments. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Subgroup analyses were rigorously conducted according to residual disease status and <i>BRCA</i> mutation status. <b>Results:</b> Among 221 patients (PDS, <i>n</i> = 60; IDS, <i>n</i> = 151), the median follow-up was 40 months. In the overall cohort, adjusted PFS and OS did not differ significantly between the PDS and IDS groups (PFS: aHR, 1.15; 95%CI, 0.67-1.98; OS: aHR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.54-2.83). Outcomes were comparable among patients achieving R0 resection. Notably, <i>BRCA</i>-mutated patients demonstrated a substantial survival advantage with PDS (<i>BRCA</i>-mutated PFS: aHR, 3.34; 95%CI, 1.06-16.67; OS: aHR, 6.07; 95%CI, 2.13-∞), whereas <i>BRCA</i> wild-type patients showed no significant difference between surgical strategies. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that BRCA-mutated patients may derive a survival benefit from PDS, whereas surgical timing had a limited impact on BRCA wild-type disease. This result underscores the importance of integrating molecular profiling, particularly <i>BRCA</i> mutation status, with surgical assessment to guide optimal and personalized treatment strategies in the PARPi era.

CancersVol. 18(2)
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.