Are We Chasing After Windmills? Barriers to Carbon Dioxide Utilization
The conversion of CO<sub>2</sub> into fuels and chemicals requires significant energy input to break C-O bonds and create C-C and C-H bonds. This review explores the energy and capital barriers to CO<sub>2</sub> utilization, using ethylene production as a case study by comparing CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction with other carbon mitigation options, including carbon capture and sequestration. The world's energy and capital resources are limited-scarce, in the parlance of economics-and choosing to use them to implement one path to decarbonization displaces other options for decarbonization or other priorities. These opportunity costs are significant and should not be ignored. Instead of breaking the C-O bonds in CO<sub>2</sub> to produce chemicals and fuels, society should prioritize the higher CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation efficiencies of alternative approaches, such as carbon capture and sequestration, new process and catalyst technologies for key molecules, and capital-efficient hydrogen production.
Authors
- Daniel A. Hickman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2751-5584)
Institutions
- Dow Chemical (India) (IN)
- Dow Chemical (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
- Published
- 2026-01-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-100724-080823
- Primary Topic
- CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00