Are We Chasing After Windmills? Barriers to Carbon Dioxide Utilization

The conversion of CO<sub>2</sub> into fuels and chemicals requires significant energy input to break C-O bonds and create C-C and C-H bonds. This review explores the energy and capital barriers to CO<sub>2</sub> utilization, using ethylene production as a case study by comparing CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction with other carbon mitigation options, including carbon capture and sequestration. The world's energy and capital resources are limited-scarce, in the parlance of economics-and choosing to use them to implement one path to decarbonization displaces other options for decarbonization or other priorities. These opportunity costs are significant and should not be ignored. Instead of breaking the C-O bonds in CO<sub>2</sub> to produce chemicals and fuels, society should prioritize the higher CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation efficiencies of alternative approaches, such as carbon capture and sequestration, new process and catalyst technologies for key molecules, and capital-efficient hydrogen production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-100724-080823
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are We Chasing After Windmills? Barriers to Carbon Dioxide Utilization

Daniel A. Hickman
Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

Are We Chasing After Windmills? Barriers to Carbon Dioxide Utilization

Daniel A. Hickman
article en

Abstract

The conversion of CO<sub>2</sub> into fuels and chemicals requires significant energy input to break C-O bonds and create C-C and C-H bonds. This review explores the energy and capital barriers to CO<sub>2</sub> utilization, using ethylene production as a case study by comparing CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction with other carbon mitigation options, including carbon capture and sequestration. The world's energy and capital resources are limited-scarce, in the parlance of economics-and choosing to use them to implement one path to decarbonization displaces other options for decarbonization or other priorities. These opportunity costs are significant and should not be ignored. Instead of breaking the C-O bonds in CO<sub>2</sub> to produce chemicals and fuels, society should prioritize the higher CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation efficiencies of alternative approaches, such as carbon capture and sequestration, new process and catalyst technologies for key molecules, and capital-efficient hydrogen production.

Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Dow Chemical (India) (IN), Dow Chemical (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.