Algorithmic processing and AI bias; using overfitting to reveal rather than perpetuate existing bias

In this paper we analyse AI overfitting in algorithmic processing to show how it relates to cases of unfairness or AI bias and how it combines with complex social phenomena such as looping effects to maintain and exacerbate existing bias. We discuss existing and proposed AI regulation attempting to address this bias to pick up dominant trends and priorities. Finally, we suggest that, although the focus of the literature currently falls on the negative consequences of overfitting, it can be used as a diagnostic tool for detecting underlying social inequalities and, as such, lead to alternative uses of AI analytics to expose social injustice rather than exacerbate it. This paper provides further theoretical support to recent views in the literature suggesting that algorithmic processing can be used to diagnose and monitor bias; by highlighting the interaction with looping effects, it also provides additional motivation to use overfitting as a first step towards mitigation of historical prejudice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-12-09
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic processing and AI bias; using overfitting to reveal rather than perpetuate existing bias

Lydia Farina, Anna-Maria Piskopani
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Algorithmic processing and AI bias; using overfitting to reveal rather than perpetuate existing bias

Lydia Farina, Anna-Maria Piskopani
article en

Abstract

In this paper we analyse AI overfitting in algorithmic processing to show how it relates to cases of unfairness or AI bias and how it combines with complex social phenomena such as looping effects to maintain and exacerbate existing bias. We discuss existing and proposed AI regulation attempting to address this bias to pick up dominant trends and priorities. Finally, we suggest that, although the focus of the literature currently falls on the negative consequences of overfitting, it can be used as a diagnostic tool for detecting underlying social inequalities and, as such, lead to alternative uses of AI analytics to expose social injustice rather than exacerbate it. This paper provides further theoretical support to recent views in the literature suggesting that algorithmic processing can be used to diagnose and monitor bias; by highlighting the interaction with looping effects, it also provides additional motivation to use overfitting as a first step towards mitigation of historical prejudice.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.