Evaluation of Diagnostic Discrepancies in Nasal Bone Fractures at Public Hospitals in East Tehran According to Forensic Experts’ Opinions (2018–2019)

Nasal bone fractures are among the most prevalent indications for referral to forensic medicine centers for examination and certification. The objective of this study was to ascertain the frequency of diagnostic discrepancies in nasal bone fractures between public hospitals and forensic medicine experts in East Tehran zfrom 2018 to 2019. In this prospective quantitative study, 200 patients referred to the East Tehran Forensic Medicine Center in 2018 were selected based on available files. A survey was conducted to assess the frequency of unconfirmed nasal fracture diagnoses from public hospitals. These diagnoses were then analyzed in conjunction with the opinions of forensic experts. The results indicated that fractures were not confirmed in 59 patients (29.5%), suggesting a substantial discrepancy ( p < .05). The underlying causes for non-confirmation included an initial diagnosis that was either incorrect or missing (55.9%), the presence of old fractures (35.6%), and post-rhinoplasty conditions (8.5%). The study’s findings indicate that approximately one-third of nasal bone fracture diagnoses from public hospitals were not in accordance with the evaluations of forensic experts. The primary etiologies of these discrepancies were identified as diagnostic errors, pre-existing fractures, and post-surgical alterations. To address these concerns, it is advisable to place greater emphasis on the following: (a) the utilization of early and precise radiographic imaging, (b) comprehensive clinical documentation, and (c) the prompt referral of patients to forensic centers for expert evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09710973251406686
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Diagnostic Discrepancies in Nasal Bone Fractures at Public Hospitals in East Tehran According to Forensic Experts’ Opinions (2018–2019)

Nahid Dadashzadeh Asl, M Ghadipasha, Ali Alimohammadi, Parviz Gholipoor et al.
Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Evaluation of Diagnostic Discrepancies in Nasal Bone Fractures at Public Hospitals in East Tehran According to Forensic Experts’ Opinions (2018–2019)

Nahid Dadashzadeh Asl, M Ghadipasha, Ali Alimohammadi, Parviz Gholipoor, Bashir Nazparvar, Katayon Sayari Nejad, Esmaiel Parsa, Shayesteh Ashrafi Isfahani
article en

Abstract

Nasal bone fractures are among the most prevalent indications for referral to forensic medicine centers for examination and certification. The objective of this study was to ascertain the frequency of diagnostic discrepancies in nasal bone fractures between public hospitals and forensic medicine experts in East Tehran zfrom 2018 to 2019. In this prospective quantitative study, 200 patients referred to the East Tehran Forensic Medicine Center in 2018 were selected based on available files. A survey was conducted to assess the frequency of unconfirmed nasal fracture diagnoses from public hospitals. These diagnoses were then analyzed in conjunction with the opinions of forensic experts. The results indicated that fractures were not confirmed in 59 patients (29.5%), suggesting a substantial discrepancy ( p < .05). The underlying causes for non-confirmation included an initial diagnosis that was either incorrect or missing (55.9%), the presence of old fractures (35.6%), and post-rhinoplasty conditions (8.5%). The study’s findings indicate that approximately one-third of nasal bone fracture diagnoses from public hospitals were not in accordance with the evaluations of forensic experts. The primary etiologies of these discrepancies were identified as diagnostic errors, pre-existing fractures, and post-surgical alterations. To address these concerns, it is advisable to place greater emphasis on the following: (a) the utilization of early and precise radiographic imaging, (b) comprehensive clinical documentation, and (c) the prompt referral of patients to forensic centers for expert evaluation.

Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic MedicineVol. 47(4)
Iranian Legal Medicine Organization (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.