Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS

This work explores the potential of the proposed FASER2 experiment at the LHC to determine the properties of a discovered heavy neutral lepton (HNL), including its mass, couplings, and whether it is a Majorana or Dirac fermion. We first consider a Majorana HNL with mass <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>m</a:mi> <a:mi>N</a:mi> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>1.84</a:mn> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>GeV</a:mi> </a:math> that is primarily produced through decays <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>D</c:mi> <c:mo stretchy="false">→</c:mo> <c:mi>μ</c:mi> <c:mi>N</c:mi> </c:math> at the ATLAS interaction point. Such HNLs may travel macroscopic distances in the far-forward direction and then decay, yielding approximately <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <f:mrow> <f:mn>8600</f:mn> <f:mtext> </f:mtext> <f:mi>N</f:mi> <f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo> <f:mi>μ</f:mi> <f:mi>π</f:mi> </f:mrow> </f:math> decays in FASER2 at the High-Luminosity LHC. With FASER2 measurements alone, the HNL’s mass and couplings can be measured to fractional uncertainties of approximately 0.1% and 3% at 95% confidence level (CL), respectively, and the Dirac fermion hypothesis can be rejected at 99.8% CL. We then consider a second, more difficult, case of a Majorana HNL with mass <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msub> <i:mi>m</i:mi> <i:mi>N</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>2.00</i:mn> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> </i:math> , yielding only <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>80</k:mn> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mo stretchy="false">→</k:mo> <k:mi>μ</k:mi> <k:mi>π</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:math> decays in FASER2. With FASER2 alone, measurements of HNL properties are still possible, but somewhat less precise. However, by using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS and measuring the charge of the muon produced in association with the HNL at ATLAS to search for lepton number violation, one can precisely measure the HNL’s properties and reject the Dirac fermion hypothesis at 99.7% CL. These results show that FASER2, sometimes in coordination with ATLAS, can precisely determine HNL properties, with far-reaching implications for our understanding of neutrino masses, baryogenesis, and the fundamental symmetries of nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/vbbq-fb1t
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS

D. Rocco, Alec Hewitt, Anonymous, Daniel Whiteson
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS

D. Rocco, Alec Hewitt, Anonymous, Daniel Whiteson
article en

Abstract

This work explores the potential of the proposed FASER2 experiment at the LHC to determine the properties of a discovered heavy neutral lepton (HNL), including its mass, couplings, and whether it is a Majorana or Dirac fermion. We first consider a Majorana HNL with mass <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>m</a:mi> <a:mi>N</a:mi> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>1.84</a:mn> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>GeV</a:mi> </a:math> that is primarily produced through decays <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>D</c:mi> <c:mo stretchy="false">→</c:mo> <c:mi>μ</c:mi> <c:mi>N</c:mi> </c:math> at the ATLAS interaction point. Such HNLs may travel macroscopic distances in the far-forward direction and then decay, yielding approximately <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <f:mrow> <f:mn>8600</f:mn> <f:mtext> </f:mtext> <f:mi>N</f:mi> <f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo> <f:mi>μ</f:mi> <f:mi>π</f:mi> </f:mrow> </f:math> decays in FASER2 at the High-Luminosity LHC. With FASER2 measurements alone, the HNL’s mass and couplings can be measured to fractional uncertainties of approximately 0.1% and 3% at 95% confidence level (CL), respectively, and the Dirac fermion hypothesis can be rejected at 99.8% CL. We then consider a second, more difficult, case of a Majorana HNL with mass <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msub> <i:mi>m</i:mi> <i:mi>N</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>2.00</i:mn> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> </i:math> , yielding only <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>80</k:mn> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>N</k:mi> <k:mo stretchy="false">→</k:mo> <k:mi>μ</k:mi> <k:mi>π</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:math> decays in FASER2. With FASER2 alone, measurements of HNL properties are still possible, but somewhat less precise. However, by using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS and measuring the charge of the muon produced in association with the HNL at ATLAS to search for lepton number violation, one can precisely measure the HNL’s properties and reject the Dirac fermion hypothesis at 99.7% CL. These results show that FASER2, sometimes in coordination with ATLAS, can precisely determine HNL properties, with far-reaching implications for our understanding of neutrino masses, baryogenesis, and the fundamental symmetries of nature.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(3)
University of California System (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.