Sustainable AI-Driven Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Fairness, Transparency, Pedagogical Innovation, and Governance

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in higher-education assessment; however, existing research remains fragmented, with limited synthesis regarding the interplay of fairness, transparency, pedagogy, and governance. To address this gap, this systematic review analyzed 47 studies published between 2019 and 2025 across Western, Gulf, South Asian, and East Asian contexts, employing the PRISMA 2020 framework. Among these studies, 32 addressed fairness, 29 examined transparency, 34 explored pedagogical implications, and 22 investigated governance practices. Quantitative evidence demonstrated that AI achieved greater scoring consistency than human graders in over two-thirds of fairness-focused studies. Conversely, more than half of the transparency studies identified inadequate or partial disclosure of AI decision processes. Pedagogical studies indicated AI-enhanced feedback frequency and revision opportunities in approximately 70% of cases, although teacher mediation was necessary to mitigate over-reliance. Governance findings showed that fewer than one-third of institutions had established policies or audit mechanisms for ethical AI use. Based on these patterns, the review proposes a governance-anchored model that integrates fairness and transparency with pedagogical design, providing a coherent framework for institutions aiming to implement AI-based assessment responsibly and equitably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020785
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable AI-Driven Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Fairness, Transparency, Pedagogical Innovation, and Governance

Maha Alfaleh
Sustainability
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sustainable AI-Driven Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Fairness, Transparency, Pedagogical Innovation, and Governance

Maha Alfaleh
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in higher-education assessment; however, existing research remains fragmented, with limited synthesis regarding the interplay of fairness, transparency, pedagogy, and governance. To address this gap, this systematic review analyzed 47 studies published between 2019 and 2025 across Western, Gulf, South Asian, and East Asian contexts, employing the PRISMA 2020 framework. Among these studies, 32 addressed fairness, 29 examined transparency, 34 explored pedagogical implications, and 22 investigated governance practices. Quantitative evidence demonstrated that AI achieved greater scoring consistency than human graders in over two-thirds of fairness-focused studies. Conversely, more than half of the transparency studies identified inadequate or partial disclosure of AI decision processes. Pedagogical studies indicated AI-enhanced feedback frequency and revision opportunities in approximately 70% of cases, although teacher mediation was necessary to mitigate over-reliance. Governance findings showed that fewer than one-third of institutions had established policies or audit mechanisms for ethical AI use. Based on these patterns, the review proposes a governance-anchored model that integrates fairness and transparency with pedagogical design, providing a coherent framework for institutions aiming to implement AI-based assessment responsibly and equitably.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
Northern Border University (SA)
Northern Border University
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.