Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images

The purpose of this study was to compare manual assessment of corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) and dendritic cell (DC) density with an automated assessment method utilizing deep learning segmentation to perform rule-based density estimation. Corneal images were acquired using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) from 100 participants with persistent ocular symptoms after mild COVID-19 (Group 1) and 30 controls without symptoms (Group 2). In total, 1,300 IVCM images were selected and manually annotated for CNFL, and 1,300 for DCs (with dendrites and without dendrites), using FIJI tools. The between-method difference in mean CNFL density was 0.2 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [0.09, 0.23]) for Group 1 and -0.2 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-0.34, -0.10]) for Group 2. For Group 1, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was -1.1 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.78, -0.39]), and for DCs without dendrites it was -3.1 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-5.1, -1.0]). For Group 2, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was -1.0 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.79, -0.27]), and for DCs without dendrites it was 0.3 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.93, 2.60]). Both manual and automated methods showed significant between-group differences for CNFL (p=0.012 and p=0.034, respectively) and DC densities (p=0.005 and p=0.010). The automated approach performed comparably to manual assessment, supporting its potential for reliable, scalable analysis of CNFL and DC in IVCM images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34412-6
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images

António Filipe Macedo, Welf Löwe, Alisa Lincke, Jenny Roth et al.
Scientific Reports
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images

António Filipe Macedo, Welf Löwe, Alisa Lincke, Jenny Roth, Neil Lagali, Ava Dashti, Yan Song, Jorge Lazo, Meichen Ji
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare manual assessment of corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) and dendritic cell (DC) density with an automated assessment method utilizing deep learning segmentation to perform rule-based density estimation. Corneal images were acquired using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) from 100 participants with persistent ocular symptoms after mild COVID-19 (Group 1) and 30 controls without symptoms (Group 2). In total, 1,300 IVCM images were selected and manually annotated for CNFL, and 1,300 for DCs (with dendrites and without dendrites), using FIJI tools. The between-method difference in mean CNFL density was 0.2 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [0.09, 0.23]) for Group 1 and -0.2 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-0.34, -0.10]) for Group 2. For Group 1, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was -1.1 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.78, -0.39]), and for DCs without dendrites it was -3.1 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-5.1, -1.0]). For Group 2, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was -1.0 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.79, -0.27]), and for DCs without dendrites it was 0.3 [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [-1.93, 2.60]). Both manual and automated methods showed significant between-group differences for CNFL (p=0.012 and p=0.034, respectively) and DC densities (p=0.005 and p=0.010). The automated approach performed comparably to manual assessment, supporting its potential for reliable, scalable analysis of CNFL and DC in IVCM images.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Linköping University (SE), Linnaeus University (SE), University of Minho (PT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.