Machine learning enables efficient and effective affinity maturation of nanobodies

Antibodies can bind their targets with exquisite potency and selectivity due in part to large antibody-target protein-protein interaction surface areas. Despite the very large size and diversity of synthetic libraries, <i>in vitro</i> sorting alone tends to yield binders with modest affinities. By analogy to the <i>in vivo</i> affinity maturation in the natural immune system, these initial hits are typically affinity matured <i>in vitro</i> to achieve high affinity binding. However, affinity maturation campaigns can be laborious, often requiring multiple selection rounds and strategies for each clone to be optimized. Here, we investigated whether one could accelerate the discovery of optimized binders using machine learning on sequencing data from single selection sorts of affinity maturation yeast-display campaigns. Our results show that sparse sequencing data from a single sorting round can predict sequences that are enriched after multiple rounds. We also find that linear models outperform deep neural networks and semi-supervised approaches in ranking validated affinity-enhancing substitutions. Linear models are also more interpretable, offering insights into residue preferences that can be leveraged for further engineering. We use our models to design and select optimized nanobody binders to relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), yielding multiple improved binders including 3 sub nanomolar binders with the best exhibiting a ~2500-fold improvement over WT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.11.698911
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning enables efficient and effective affinity maturation of nanobodies

debora marks, Aaron W. Kollasch, Conor McMahon, Edward P. Harvey et al.
1 citations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
31.92
article

Machine learning enables efficient and effective affinity maturation of nanobodies

debora marks, Aaron W. Kollasch, Conor McMahon, Edward P. Harvey, Adam J. Riesselman, Artem Gazizov, Murali Anuganti, Deborah Moshinsky, Steffan B. Paul, Filmawit Belay, J Wade Harper, L Robert Hollingsworth, Haisun Zhu, James Osei-Owusu, Minh Anh Kieu, Andrew C Kruse, Andre Razevedo Reis Teixeira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Antibodies can bind their targets with exquisite potency and selectivity due in part to large antibody-target protein-protein interaction surface areas. Despite the very large size and diversity of synthetic libraries, <i>in vitro</i> sorting alone tends to yield binders with modest affinities. By analogy to the <i>in vivo</i> affinity maturation in the natural immune system, these initial hits are typically affinity matured <i>in vitro</i> to achieve high affinity binding. However, affinity maturation campaigns can be laborious, often requiring multiple selection rounds and strategies for each clone to be optimized. Here, we investigated whether one could accelerate the discovery of optimized binders using machine learning on sequencing data from single selection sorts of affinity maturation yeast-display campaigns. Our results show that sparse sequencing data from a single sorting round can predict sequences that are enriched after multiple rounds. We also find that linear models outperform deep neural networks and semi-supervised approaches in ranking validated affinity-enhancing substitutions. Linear models are also more interpretable, offering insights into residue preferences that can be leveraged for further engineering. We use our models to design and select optimized nanobody binders to relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), yielding multiple improved binders including 3 sub nanomolar binders with the best exhibiting a ~2500-fold improvement over WT.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Broad Institute (US), Harvard University (US), Institute for Protein Innovation (US), Boston VA Research Institute (US), Harvard Stem Cell Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.