Sport Participation Type and Cognitive Function in Collegiate Student-Athletes

Considerable concerns have been raised regarding potential neurocognitive deficits associated with participation in contact and collision sports. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of sport-type participation on cognitive performance during the trail making test. We assessed 543 student-athletes from two universities, classified as collision, contact, or non-contact sport athletes, who performed the trail making test. Three analyses of covariance compared performance with common confounders as covariates. There was no difference between trail making test-A (<i>p</i>=0.381) and trail making test-B (<i>p</i> =0.063) times. There was a significant main effect for trail making test difference performance (non-contact: 17.3+9.1 s, contact: 20.1+10.5 s, and collision: 24.3+11.8 s; <i>F</i>=6.278, <i>p</i>=0.002, and <i>η</i> <sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.020). There was a significant post-hoc difference only between the contact/collision and non-contact groups (<i>p</i>=0.001 and <i>d</i>=0.66). Collision sport athletes exhibited worse trail making test difference performance, warranting ongoing cognitive assessments with longitudinal designs. However, collision sport athlete's performance was better than general college students supporting the positive benefits of physical activity on cognitive performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2785-7470
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sport Participation Type and Cognitive Function in Collegiate Student-Athletes

Thomas A. Buckley, Melissa N. Anderson, Barry A. Bodt, Thomas W McAllister et al.
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Sport Participation Type and Cognitive Function in Collegiate Student-Athletes

Thomas A. Buckley, Melissa N. Anderson, Barry A. Bodt, Thomas W McAllister, Steven P. Broglio, Margot Putukian, Michael McCrea, Zarek O Harper
article en

Abstract

Considerable concerns have been raised regarding potential neurocognitive deficits associated with participation in contact and collision sports. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of sport-type participation on cognitive performance during the trail making test. We assessed 543 student-athletes from two universities, classified as collision, contact, or non-contact sport athletes, who performed the trail making test. Three analyses of covariance compared performance with common confounders as covariates. There was no difference between trail making test-A (<i>p</i>=0.381) and trail making test-B (<i>p</i> =0.063) times. There was a significant main effect for trail making test difference performance (non-contact: 17.3+9.1 s, contact: 20.1+10.5 s, and collision: 24.3+11.8 s; <i>F</i>=6.278, <i>p</i>=0.002, and <i>η</i> <sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.020). There was a significant post-hoc difference only between the contact/collision and non-contact groups (<i>p</i>=0.001 and <i>d</i>=0.66). Collision sport athletes exhibited worse trail making test difference performance, warranting ongoing cognitive assessments with longitudinal designs. However, collision sport athlete's performance was better than general college students supporting the positive benefits of physical activity on cognitive performance.

International Journal of Sports Medicine
National Institutes of Health (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Major League Baseball (US), Department of Behavioral Health (US), Ohio University (US), Michigan Medicine (US), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.