Prediction of adverse outcomes for early-onset fetal growth restriction: a prospective study

Early-onset growth restriction (eoFGR) has a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study aimed to apply ultrasonic Doppler measurement and Fetal heart quantification (Fetal HQ) to predict the risk of adverse outcomes in eoFGR fetuses. In this prospective study of singleton pregnancies with eoFGR, fetuses were stratified into a group with adverse outcomes and those without. The primary outcome was the composite adverse outcome,defined as a composite of one or more of the following outcomes: perinatal death, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical venous blood pH < 7.0, etc. Exclusion criteria included confirmed fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies, poor-quality ultrasound images, etc. All participants were performed both Doppler ultrasound and Fetal HQ assessment. Independent predictors of adverse outcomes in eoFGR fetuses were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. We examined 137 normal fetuses and 85 fetuses with eoFGR between 22 and 38 weeks’ gestation. Of these eoFGR cases, 43 were identified with adverse outcomes, and 42 were without. Compared to those without the composite adverse outcome, eoFGR fetuses with it exhibited significantly lower umbilical vein blood flow (UVF) and global sphericity index (GSI), decreased fractional shortening (FS) of right ventricular segments 11–17, and higher rates of umbilical artery (UA) abnormalities, ductus venosus (DV) and coronary artery (CA) dilation. The addition of UVF percentile, CA dilation, or GSI percentile significantly enhanced the AUC for predicting the composite adverse outcome compared to UA abnormalities alone, with the UA abnormalities + UVF percentile combination achieving the highest value. Although the combined model of UA abnormalities, CA dilation, UVF percentile, and GSI percentile achieved the highest AUC of 0.92 for prediction of the composite adverse outcome, it did not yield a statistically significant improvement over the model incorporating only UA abnormalities and UVF percentile (AUC = 0.85). Reduced UVF, GSI, Doppler abnormalities in the UA, DV, and CA dilation were associated with the composite adverse outcome in eoFGR fetuses. A model including UVF percentile and UA abnormalities significantly improved the predictive performance for composite adverse outcome compared to models using UA abnormalities alone or supplemented by CA dilation or GSI percentile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08612-x
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of adverse outcomes for early-onset fetal growth restriction: a prospective study

Shanshan Mei, Hongying Wang, Danping Huang, Rui Zhang et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Prediction of adverse outcomes for early-onset fetal growth restriction: a prospective study

Shanshan Mei, Hongying Wang, Danping Huang, Rui Zhang, Yunyu Chen, Lan Huang, Xiaodie Liu, Yiling Li, Yuling Song
article en

Abstract

Early-onset growth restriction (eoFGR) has a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study aimed to apply ultrasonic Doppler measurement and Fetal heart quantification (Fetal HQ) to predict the risk of adverse outcomes in eoFGR fetuses. In this prospective study of singleton pregnancies with eoFGR, fetuses were stratified into a group with adverse outcomes and those without. The primary outcome was the composite adverse outcome,defined as a composite of one or more of the following outcomes: perinatal death, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical venous blood pH < 7.0, etc. Exclusion criteria included confirmed fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies, poor-quality ultrasound images, etc. All participants were performed both Doppler ultrasound and Fetal HQ assessment. Independent predictors of adverse outcomes in eoFGR fetuses were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. We examined 137 normal fetuses and 85 fetuses with eoFGR between 22 and 38 weeks’ gestation. Of these eoFGR cases, 43 were identified with adverse outcomes, and 42 were without. Compared to those without the composite adverse outcome, eoFGR fetuses with it exhibited significantly lower umbilical vein blood flow (UVF) and global sphericity index (GSI), decreased fractional shortening (FS) of right ventricular segments 11–17, and higher rates of umbilical artery (UA) abnormalities, ductus venosus (DV) and coronary artery (CA) dilation. The addition of UVF percentile, CA dilation, or GSI percentile significantly enhanced the AUC for predicting the composite adverse outcome compared to UA abnormalities alone, with the UA abnormalities + UVF percentile combination achieving the highest value. Although the combined model of UA abnormalities, CA dilation, UVF percentile, and GSI percentile achieved the highest AUC of 0.92 for prediction of the composite adverse outcome, it did not yield a statistically significant improvement over the model incorporating only UA abnormalities and UVF percentile (AUC = 0.85). Reduced UVF, GSI, Doppler abnormalities in the UA, DV, and CA dilation were associated with the composite adverse outcome in eoFGR fetuses. A model including UVF percentile and UA abnormalities significantly improved the predictive performance for composite adverse outcome compared to models using UA abnormalities alone or supplemented by CA dilation or GSI percentile.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 26(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center (CN), Prince of Wales Hospital (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.