Political (in)visibility and governance disconnects: dealing with waste in Addis Ababa and Faisalabad

Like many large cities in the Global South, Addis Ababa and Faisalabad have struggled to improve their solid waste management (SWM) systems. The political economy of the sector, alongside local attitudes towards waste work, creates a complex governance environment in which solutions are far from obvious. This article traces social, political and institutional change in the SWM systems of the two cities through a comparative, interdisciplinary analysis anchored in three governance arenas: institutional and policy frameworks,the roles and agency of key actors, and everyday waste practices. Despite substantial institutional differences, we find that service levels and waste workers’ livelihoods are similar. While both cities have moved towards an integrated approach to SWM,imported principles and best practices have not been adequately contextualised. Addressing governance disconnects will depend less on technical fixes than on the public authorities’ ability to place-based, constructive interaction between ‘formal’ and ‘informal’ actors and practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Development Studies
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2026.2613972
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political (in)visibility and governance disconnects: dealing with waste in Addis Ababa and Faisalabad

Eyob Balcha Gebremariam, Nuno Cruz, Saeeduddin Ahmed
1 citations
Oxford Development Studies
Municipal Solid Waste Management
35.31
article

Political (in)visibility and governance disconnects: dealing with waste in Addis Ababa and Faisalabad

Eyob Balcha Gebremariam, Nuno Cruz, Saeeduddin Ahmed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Like many large cities in the Global South, Addis Ababa and Faisalabad have struggled to improve their solid waste management (SWM) systems. The political economy of the sector, alongside local attitudes towards waste work, creates a complex governance environment in which solutions are far from obvious. This article traces social, political and institutional change in the SWM systems of the two cities through a comparative, interdisciplinary analysis anchored in three governance arenas: institutional and policy frameworks,the roles and agency of key actors, and everyday waste practices. Despite substantial institutional differences, we find that service levels and waste workers’ livelihoods are similar. While both cities have moved towards an integrated approach to SWM,imported principles and best practices have not been adequately contextualised. Addressing governance disconnects will depend less on technical fixes than on the public authorities’ ability to place-based, constructive interaction between ‘formal’ and ‘informal’ actors and practices.

Oxford Development Studies
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), University of Bristol (GB), University of Aveiro (PT), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
35.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.