Evaluation of global research on agricultural nitrogen pollution between 1990 and 2023: Challenges for more efficacy and equity

Excessive and inefficient nitrogen (N) use in agriculture poses pervasive environmental threats for Water quality, Air quality, Greenhouse gas emissions, Ecosystems and biodiversity, and Soil (WAGES). However, it is unclear whether the global distribution of research corresponds to the severity of these threats. Here we provide a global assessment linking research outputs across WAGES with cropland N surplus, a proxy for the severity of N threats. We show that N surplus correlates well with the number of publications addressing WAGES threats, although marked regional disparities exist. Higher income countries distribute research more evenly across threats associated with high fertiliser inputs, while lower income countries prioritise soil research, particularly soil fertility. Publications from lower income countries account for only 8 % of the total and focus largely on food security rather than on N pollution. Since these countries are responsible for half of global N losses, they represent important “low hanging fruits” where targeted research can simultaneously improve food security and reduce N pollution. Our study highlights the need to strengthen research capacity, support locally led priorities, and better align research investments with the severity of N threats to advance toward more equitable and effective N management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104312
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of global research on agricultural nitrogen pollution between 1990 and 2023: Challenges for more efficacy and equity

H.J.M. van Grinsven, J. Serra, W. de Vries, J. Mogollon et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Evaluation of global research on agricultural nitrogen pollution between 1990 and 2023: Challenges for more efficacy and equity

H.J.M. van Grinsven, J. Serra, W. de Vries, J. Mogollon, M. Graversgaard, K. Hayashi, E. Aguilera, C.S.C. Marques-dos-Santos, L. Lassaletta, J. Marinheiro, F. Giannini-Kurina, G.H. Ros, A. Sanz-Cobeña, M. Quemada, K. Butterbach-Bahl, T. Dalgaard
article en

Abstract

Excessive and inefficient nitrogen (N) use in agriculture poses pervasive environmental threats for Water quality, Air quality, Greenhouse gas emissions, Ecosystems and biodiversity, and Soil (WAGES). However, it is unclear whether the global distribution of research corresponds to the severity of these threats. Here we provide a global assessment linking research outputs across WAGES with cropland N surplus, a proxy for the severity of N threats. We show that N surplus correlates well with the number of publications addressing WAGES threats, although marked regional disparities exist. Higher income countries distribute research more evenly across threats associated with high fertiliser inputs, while lower income countries prioritise soil research, particularly soil fertility. Publications from lower income countries account for only 8 % of the total and focus largely on food security rather than on N pollution. Since these countries are responsible for half of global N losses, they represent important “low hanging fruits” where targeted research can simultaneously improve food security and reduce N pollution. Our study highlights the need to strengthen research capacity, support locally led priorities, and better align research investments with the severity of N threats to advance toward more equitable and effective N management.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 176
Aarhus Universitet, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.