Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions – A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota

PurposeThis study examines community and provider perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the <i>Theory of Planned Behavior</i> (TPB) to identify barriers and interventions for improving screening rates.Approach or DesignA mixed methods research design using focus groups with community members and semi-structured interviews with health care providers in counties with the highest and lowest CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Data analysis was guided by the TPB.SettingNorth Dakota counties with the highest and lowest CRC MIRs, covering urban and rural populations.ParticipantsTwenty community members aged 50+ (18 women, 2 men) participated in 5 in-person and 3 virtual focus groups. Eight health care providers, including physicians and nurse practitioners, were interviewed virtually.MethodFocus groups and interviews were conducted between summer and fall 2023. Discussions were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using Dedoose, guided by the TPB.ResultsTop barriers included access to screening (total codes, n = 183), fear/stigma (n = 126), provider communication (n = 80), cost (n = 67), and travel (n = 58). Community members relied on social networks over providers for screening decisions. No significant differences emerged between high- and low-MIR counties, nor between rural and urban, indicating systemic rather than geographic barriers.ConclusionFindings suggest improving provider communication, leveraging trusted social networks, addressing stigma, and reducing barriers to screening (eg, cost, transportation). Future interventions should prioritize community-informed health promotion efforts to increase CRC screening rates and improve health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261417439
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions – A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota

Shawnda Schroeder, Cameryn Ryan, Sabha Ganai
American Journal of Health Promotion
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions – A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota

Shawnda Schroeder, Cameryn Ryan, Sabha Ganai
article en

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines community and provider perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the <i>Theory of Planned Behavior</i> (TPB) to identify barriers and interventions for improving screening rates.Approach or DesignA mixed methods research design using focus groups with community members and semi-structured interviews with health care providers in counties with the highest and lowest CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Data analysis was guided by the TPB.SettingNorth Dakota counties with the highest and lowest CRC MIRs, covering urban and rural populations.ParticipantsTwenty community members aged 50+ (18 women, 2 men) participated in 5 in-person and 3 virtual focus groups. Eight health care providers, including physicians and nurse practitioners, were interviewed virtually.MethodFocus groups and interviews were conducted between summer and fall 2023. Discussions were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using Dedoose, guided by the TPB.ResultsTop barriers included access to screening (total codes, n = 183), fear/stigma (n = 126), provider communication (n = 80), cost (n = 67), and travel (n = 58). Community members relied on social networks over providers for screening decisions. No significant differences emerged between high- and low-MIR counties, nor between rural and urban, indicating systemic rather than geographic barriers.ConclusionFindings suggest improving provider communication, leveraging trusted social networks, addressing stigma, and reducing barriers to screening (eg, cost, transportation). Future interventions should prioritize community-informed health promotion efforts to increase CRC screening rates and improve health equity.

American Journal of Health Promotion
University of North Dakota (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.